Frederick Solicitors レビュヌ 

31
•
TrustScore 5段階評䟡の3.5

3.4

レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら

レビュアヌのコメントを芋おみたしょう

5぀星のうち4の評䟡

Hi, my experience was Very Good. Everthing new 4Me , but other side find a good Comunicator , Good listen, Feeling Someone really want help Resolve my Situation. Basically with al my Difficults abou... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Wish there was a choice of ‘Zero’, I would’ve given them a zero rating. Very unprofessional and rude attitude. They did not wanted to take my case on ‘No Win No Fee’ basis and for that reason they... もっず芋る

䌁業が回答したした

5぀星のうち5の評䟡

While my call with Johnathon was initial advice today, he has given me advice and information that gives me what I need to start to resolve my situation. His guidance was provided in a reassuring a... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち5の評䟡

Really, glad I came across Frederick's solicitors. I had previously had a bad experience with another solicitor but was amazed by the knowledge, professionalism provided by Jonathan. His focus was on... もっず芋る

䌁業が回答したした

䌁業情報

  1. 雇甚専門匁護士
  2. ・
  3. 人事コンサルティング
  4. 法埋家

圓該䌁業による蚘述

Frederick Solicitors are Employment Law Experts. Our focus is on providing you with the most effective solution no matter what the issue is that you face.


連絡先

3.4

たあたあ

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の3.5

31件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

最近のレビュヌ䟝頌の蚘録はありたせん

この䌁業は最近、顧客にレビュヌを䟝頌しおいないため、レビュヌが党䜓の意芋を反映しおいない可胜性がありたす。

ネガティブなレビュヌの 25に回答しおいたす

通垞24時間以内に回答

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

3.4

すべおのレビュヌ

(31)

過去12か月のレビュヌ数: 12ä»¶

レビュヌを曞く
Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

I am giving one Star because by their actions they give Solicitors a bad name

I am giving one Star because it doesn't allow me to give None. People contact an employment law solicitor when many are at a very low and emotional point in their life having lost their employment. They need help. The warning sign should have been just how quickly an invoice was forwarded. But it did have a disclaimer on it saying that work would not be carried out until after the 14 day legal cooling off period. For this reason alone I paid £2400.00
Before the 14 days Acas contacted me so I called Johnathan to ask for my refund and that I would contact him again after my discussion with Acas. To my horror he said that he had carried out over £1400 worth of work in carrying out Anti money laundering and identification checks. He had also written a letter, (I have never seen sight of it) to my ex-employee. I have complained to the Legal Ombudsman - case F208584 but this will take years.
PLEASE - avoid Frederick Solicitors like the Plague. Please note, having read the reply from Frederick Solicitors I state as FACT that no waiver was signed and the reply from Frederick Solicitors is incorrect and a fantasy drempt up as damage limitation.... whilst my complaint will be upheld unfortunately taking a claim to the Legal Ombudsman is a very slow process.

2026幎3月4日
自発的なレビュヌ
Frederick Solicitors ロゎ

Frederick Solicitors からの回答

Dear Ian, Thank you for your feedback. You instructed us to negotiate a settlement of your claim. In relation to the 14 day cooling off period, you signed a wavier requesting us to start the work on your file immediately due to the urgency of the matter. We therefore commenced work immediately on your file as per your request. You provided us with your documents, which were reviewed; the merits of the claim(s) were assessed and the value of the claim was quantified. Further, we prepared a legal claim and settlement proposal for your ex employer to consider. All of that work is of course chargeable work. After the work had been done and discussed with you, you then stated that you did not want to proceed with the case. However as you had asked us to undertake chargeable work you were sent an invoice for the work done on the file once you ended the retainer. What you appear to have wanted is for us to do the work for you, you then cancel the agreement, and for you not to be charged. You were fully aware the work was being undertaken as we kept you consulted and discussions were being held with you as to how we were proceeding. We appreciate when people face employment law issues, it is a difficult time, however, you were clear with your instructions and indeed signed the waiver to request chargeable work to commence immediately and we did explain our fees our fees clearly to you at the outset.

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

I instructed this sole trader law firm


I instructed this sole trader law firm on December 2023. On the phone he advised me that it was on "no win no fee", when he sent me the agreement he requested £600 so called fixed fee. About three months later he requested £840 for a two hour hearing, saying that was not covered in the fixed fee. About four months later, he requested £1500+ vat for a hearing which didn't exist, when I asked him to send me paperwork from Employment Tribunal, he replied that it was a confusion, and it was a mistake. In April 2024,he sent me quotations from four different barristers, the cheapest one was £14,000, so it became apparent that he was not willing to settle the case without the need to go to the final hearings which would last for 7 days. I consulted another Employment specialist fim and was advised that The case was not worth more than £10,000 and that it was a big risk to pay a barrister £14,000, and he asked £80,000 initially, second time, £50,000,third time £40,000, he was acting out only for his own interest. His intentions were to take the case straight to the final hearings. I didn't have £14,000 to pay the Barrister, and I had to withdraw from the agreement, he settled the case for £9.5000, he kept the money, besides he sent me a bill for £17,0000 for breach of agreement. I strongly believe that he plays the same tactics with everyone. My advice to you, is to stay well away from this Sole Trader Law Firm, do not even contact him for advice.

2025幎12月26日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Deeply disappointing, extremely costly, and not a service I could recommend

My experience with this firm, and with Jonathan Frederick in particular, was extremely poor. I was charged more than £12,000 for a case that barely progressed, never reached a hearing, and ultimately had to be taken forward by myself after ending the retainer. The majority of the bill came from charges for reading emails — even when those emails received no reply and did absolutely nothing to advance my case.

I repeatedly felt unsupported and left in the dark. When I asked for a proper meeting to discuss my situation, I was refused, yet I continued to be billed for every small piece of correspondence. The service felt transactional, impersonal, and focused far more on billing than on actually helping me.

Looking back, the fees were totally disproportionate to the work delivered, and the value I received was extremely poor. I would strongly advise others to think very carefully before instructing this firm based on my experience.

2025幎11月23日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Removal of true negative experiences at Fredrick Solicitors. The experience I had is true and it is good upfront knowledge for anyone is a stressful situation and expecting these solicitors to help.

Dear Trustpilot and Fredrick Solicitors I do not want this review removed. This was a true experience I had with this company. I am happy to shared further is required .

Sue

2024幎8月1日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Wish there was a choice of ‘Zero’

Wish there was a choice of ‘Zero’, I would’ve given them a zero rating. Very unprofessional and rude attitude.
They did not wanted to take my case on ‘No Win No Fee’ basis and for that reason they acted like they were representing my Employer.
When I asked them to listen to what I say that why my dismissal was unfair then their representative said, “we will represent you but not on NWNF.” I said, no thanks I don’t want you to represent me even for free.
My advice to others is, “AVOIDE THIS LAW FIRM!”

2024幎7月22日
自発的なレビュヌ
Frederick Solicitors ロゎ

Frederick Solicitors からの回答

Hi Shahid.

We listened carefully to what you had to say. You accepted that you did the conduct complained of by your employer, which resulted in your dismissal. Conduct such as that amounts to gross misconduct and in such circumstances a Tribunal is likely to find that a dismissal is fair. You did not accept our opinion and again repeated your reasons why you felt that your dismissal was unfair. We explained why those reasons did not make any difference to the likely outcome of your case but again you did not accept our opinion or explanation. As the reasons you gave did not change our view on the merits of your case, we advised you that as there was less than 51% chance of success, a no win no fee agreement was not suitable. We do have to be frank and transparent with the advice that we give and we do appreciate that you were disappointed because this was not the advice that you were expecting, given that you were adamant that your dismissal was unfair. However, we would rather be honest and open with our advice than to give you a false sense of hope and charge you for a case that is likely to be unsuccessful.

5぀星のうち5の評䟡

Reccomend

Very clear explanation around what I could expect & what is normal during work grievances. Was even kind enough to send it in writing so I can refer to it later.

2023幎1月19日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち5の評䟡

Exceptional service and settlement for my Tribunal case

From my initial conversation to the settlement of my case, Jonathan was not only extremely professional but very friendly which made my experience the best it could be in a difficult time of my life. My case was a challenging one, with no settlement in sight. Despite my limited knowledge on Employment Law and how to take a case to court, Jonathan took care great care to explain everything I needed to do and prepare all my paperwork for Tribunal. He also continued attempts at negotiation, whilst providing reassurance which was very welcome. Jonathan always got back to my emails promptly and took the time to have phone calls when we needed to discuss things in more detail. He very kindly took on my case as a no win no fee which was the only way I could afford to pursue the case. Just before the case was to go to court, he managed to settle my case at a figure above what I had hoped going in which was a huge relief. Had it not been for his hard work, professional manner and kindness, I would not have been able to find closure. I would absolutely recommend his services, and I hope for anyone reading this review to consider at least reaching out. Prior to Frederick Solicitors, I had dealt with a few other solicitors and I can say for certain his service was the best.

2022幎10月21日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち5の評䟡

Excellent and concise initial advice.

While my call with Johnathon was initial advice today, he has given me advice and information that gives me what I need to start to resolve my situation. His guidance was provided in a reassuring and friendly way, and reminds me that I do have rights within my employment, and clarity around my situation and the reality of it.
Should I need further support and help I will be back, confident that he will be able ton support further.
Thank you.

2022幎7月18日
自発的なレビュヌ

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報