レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら

レビュアヌのコメントを芋おみたしょう

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Barclays had instructed this “firm” to complete my remortgage in May (we’re still going). It has been nothing but problems from start to finish, “Josh” on the so-called legal team is incompetent and... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち5の評䟡

Absolutely brilliant service from this company , first found while scrolling on facebook. Could not fault the people and service received. From first call back the next day to completion. Special sho... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち5の評䟡

I was quite nicely surprised with how our remortgage was dealt with. You always assume solicitors drag their heels but I didn’t get this impression from Integrar. There were many names that I had corr... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち5の評䟡

The re mortgage process was very straightforward, which we were very grateful for. We were surprised at how quickly everything was completed especially due to the time of year it was, but very thankf... もっず芋る

䌁業情報

  1. 䞍動産譲枡専門の匁護士

圓該䌁業による蚘述

Integrar is a market leader in the provision of conveyancing services. Specialising in delivering a commoditised remortgage service for banks and building societies, alongside home-mover services to customers; estate agents and financial advisors. We are committed to providing the best possible services to our clients and have achieved both Lexcel and the Law Society’s Conveyancing Quality scheme approved status.


連絡先

3.8

ほが満足

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の4

1655件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

最近のレビュヌ䟝頌の蚘録はありたせん

この䌁業は最近、顧客にレビュヌを䟝頌しおいないため、レビュヌが党䜓の意芋を反映しおいない可胜性がありたす。

ネガティブなレビュヌに回答しおいたせん

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

3.8

すべおのレビュヌ

(1,655)

過去12か月のレビュヌ数: 236ä»¶

レビュヌを曞く
Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Barclays had instructed this “firm” to


Barclays had instructed this “firm” to complete my remortgage in May (we’re still going). It has been nothing but problems from start to finish, “Josh” on the so-called legal team is incompetent and rude, repeatedly refused to send out documents to myself and ignored emails for days, I had to call up 6 times just to be given the mortgage deed to then find out that I’d been given the incorrect one! I would avoid these con artists at all costs. Tried charging me for things that I didn’t ask for and whenever you query a fee with the people on the phone they all just defend it! I then had a missed call and when I phoned back I was firstly told there wasn’t one? And was then told to leave a good review on trustpilot! Are you joking? If you want anything doing I suggest you speak to Barclays and ask them for a new solicitor like I did

2026幎8月8日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

They simply do not act in the interest


They simply do not act in the interest of their clients. They are completely hands off, they blamed me for agreeing a completion date on my end of deal mortgage only to realise that they incurred me late repayment charge because the deal was actually ending on that day and not the following day!!! I asked them to fix this error because clearly I was switching from one deal to another on the end of current mortgage deal as my mortgage advisor advised them, but they came back and blamed me for this! That I should know that completion should happen after the deal ends and not ON the last day! I will be suing them if they don't give me back my money.

2026幎8月3日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Integrar end up costing me dual interest

Integrar decided to ask my new lender for mortgage advance 1 business day prior and there was immediate weekend following before completion. This resulted in me paying both lenders for additional days of interest. This was done without my consent or without informing me. I wasn’t consulted about any alternative options such as delaying completion by 1 day to avoid the dual charge. My emails was ignored and when i spoke to customer experience advisor ‘Sam’ he dismissed my issue stating this is standard business practice. An enterprise of this size should do better to inform customers of risks and mitigation options. I wouldn’t recommend them, poor CX, and unresponsive over emails.

2026幎8月3日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Poor communication

This firm have been extremely poor at communicating. They do not provide detailed information about legal processes and what is required. They're slow, last minute, and send frequent out-dated automated updates which clutter up correspondence and make information difficult to obtain. I have found working with them difficult and frustrating.

2026幎7月30日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

An extremely disappointing experience.

Update: They have now refunded me the monies, whist still stating their position.

An extremely disappointing experience.

My complaint was handled by a Danny Kelly, and despite multiple emails, he repeatedly failed to answer the straightforward questions I asked.

I wasn't disputing that an additional £60 fee existed. I simply asked what work was actually carried out to justify charging it in my case. I asked:

What work was undertaken?
Who carried it out?
How long did it take?
What actions were taken to resolve the issue?

These questions were never answered.

Instead, I received generic explanations of what an OS1 search is and repeated references to their fee structure, neither of which addressed my complaint.

To make matters worse, Danny's initial response referred to my "preferred completion date", despite me never requesting one and my complaint having absolutely nothing to do with completion times. When a complaints handler includes information that is irrelevant or inaccurate, it doesn't inspire confidence that they've properly read the complaint.

The issue itself was ultimately resolved because I contacted the previous lender to have their charge removed. From my perspective, Integrar identified there was an issue but did not resolve it, yet still charged an additional £60.

The final response then stated that no further correspondence would receive a reply, despite the central questions never being answered.

This was one of the most frustrating complaints processes I've experienced. I was looking for a straightforward explanation, but instead received generic responses that completely missed the point.

Based on my experience, I would not recommend Integrar.

2026幎7月28日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Really poor solicitors

Integrar have been incredibly incompetent. They have lacked clarity in their fees and timelines, and due to THEIR shortfalls we had to delay completion of the mortgage. And even then, they charged us a fee even though the delay was solely their fault for using old documentation at completion day. Lots of hidden fees, and really poor communication.

2026幎7月26日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Incompetent and slow

Had to chase so much to get anything done. Miscalculated my completion statement used the wrong figures. Cant interact with competant solicitors as they cant understand basic legalese. Lied to me in writing.

2026幎7月22日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Fraud conveyancer

Fraud conveyancer. Extremely poor service from Integrar for my mortgage. It was supposed to be a free service provided by Barclays but I ended up paying £583 to Integrar for rent charge and indemnity insurance and other services. Barclays saying they never asked for indemnity insurance so this comes under fraud category. I am going to raise it with Legal ombudsman and wherever I can. Extremely get in touch with anyone.

Below are the charges

TT fee to send excess to the borrowers - £36.00
Copy of title registration document - £24.00
Electronic ID Check - £12.00
Electronic ID Check - £12.00
Dealing with an estate rentcharge - £180.00
Indemnity TT Fee - £36.00
Obtaining bespoke indemnity insurance policy - £54.00
Indemnity Premium - £221.76
Copy of transfer - £12.00
============
Total - £584.16

2026幎6月12日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

TERRIBLE FIRM TO WORK WITH

TERRIBLE FIRM TO WORK WITH, I would avoid at any cost.

The main issue is the lack of correspondence - which you would see that there will be no solicitor for you to work with. You will speak with admin people who will delay every response 3-4 work days. And don't be surprised if they give you unexpected costs for insurance that is not optional but also threaten you to get the insurance with an additional fee or they will close your file.

Good luck, you've been warned.

2026幎7月14日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち5の評䟡

Very pleased

I was quite nicely surprised with how our remortgage was dealt with. You always assume solicitors drag their heels but I didn’t get this impression from Integrar. There were many names that I had correspondence with through the process of our remortgage but I understand Matthew was our main caseworker and Chloe was particularly helpful and professional. Thank you

2026幎7月1日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち5の評䟡

Smooth service

Jade and Jake looked after my case. It was a very smooth service and was kept updated via email regularly when I needed to call they were quick and helpful.

2026幎7月10日
自発的なレビュヌ

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報