レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら

2.5

期埅以䞋

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の2.5

5件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

レビュヌ䟝頌の蚘録がありたせん

この䌁業は顧客にレビュヌを䟝頌しおいないため、レビュヌが党䜓の意芋を反映しおいない可胜性がありたす。

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

この䌁業を閲芧した人は、以䞋の䌁業も閲芧しおいたす。

2.5

すべおのレビュヌ

(5)

過去12か月のレビュヌ数: 5ä»¶

レビュヌを曞く

レビュヌの確認を行いたす

Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Extremely poor performance

Extremely poor performance. Paid a monthly charge just to try things out. Only 1 scene succeeded, thereafter that all credits were gone and had to buy again. Which I didn't obviously. This is a pure scam, stay away from Lune.ai

2026幎9月23日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

KEEP AWAY

stay away, find another program to make AI videos, I paid 30 dollars for plus subscription (this is what it costs per month), got 10,000 credits, made a 5 minute video and it ate all 10,000 credits + more, had to pay another 10 dollars to finish the video. the video turned out bad, the quality sucked, grainy.
just a scam. sent a complaint to them, got a message from them that the video was finished so then I didn't get anything back, so obviously normal that a 5 minute video costs over 30 dollars to make.

2026幎8月21日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

It's a waste of time and money.

It's a waste of time and money.

Each fix is ​​worse than the last. Washing machine: the simplest scene. A 5-second video is all it takes.

First, I request: the machine is running, the drum is spinning, water is leaking from the bottom. Second attempt: the drum isn't spinning. Third attempt: water is leaking directly through the door glass. Each updated frame has an increasingly pronounced magenta tint. I request that the logo dimensions be preserved: in vain, the logo is once again twice its original size. I request that the product location be fixed: no one listens, and at the end of the video, the product unexpectedly lifts itself up. Every new frame or video brings its own set of surprises. I've spent thousands of credits on this scene and I have nothing usable.

2026幎8月19日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Bugs eat your credits, then they refuse to refund you

I subscribed to Luma AI to create a video. Almost every time I gave the tool instructions, it introduced new, unrequested bugs into the production instead of applying the changes I asked for. I'd then have to spend more credits and more time just fixing problems the software itself created — not because I'd changed my mind or asked for extra work.

By the time I gave up, I'd burned through 7,261 of my 10,000 credits and still didn't have a single usable, downloadable output. I asked for a refund, explained exactly what had happened, and offered Luma full visibility into my project so they could see every instruction and every bug for themselves.

Support took over a day to reply, and instead of addressing the refund, asked me to fill out a troubleshooting form. When I pushed back, they refused the refund outright — citing a policy that refunds only apply to "unused or mostly unused" plans, and pointing to the same credit count that had been burned fixing their bugs, not producing anything I could use.

In my experience, charging customers for credits their own product's defects consumed, then hiding behind a "credits used" policy to deny a refund, is deceptive. If this is standard practice at Luma, I believe they are knowingly selling a product that isn't fit for purpose and pocketing the difference when it breaks. I've since had to pursue a chargeback with my bank because I was simply stonewalled.

I run a business myself and would never treat a customer this way. Steer clear until they fix both the product and how they handle refunds.

— Wade S., Superior Slushies

2026幎8月14日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

negative experience

My experience has been negative. I paid for a service that does not function as expected. The AI output is largely incorrect and often enters loops, repeating the same result while still consuming credits.

I contacted support and received a response only after several weeks. The reply requested extensive additional information and feedback, effectively requiring significant unpaid effort on my part.

At one point, even the AI system itself indicated it could not complete the task correctly, yet credits were still deducted. This is not acceptable.

2026幎5月6日
自発的なレビュヌ

レビュヌの察象になっおいる䌁業の方ぞ

プロフィヌルを登録しお、Trustpilot の無料ビゞネス ツヌルにアクセスし、お客様ずの぀ながりを広げおください。

無料アカりントを取埗

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報