Thank you for sharing your experience, even though it was a negative one for you. We value feedback from every partner and are always open to an honest dialogue. However, in this particular case, we have to disagree with your claims and provide the facts that clarify the real situation.
Yes, your payment was suspended - but not at our discretion. It happened after several advertisers, one after another, rejected your traffic due to fraud. Below are their verbatim conclusions:
Vicibet fraud, rejection
âAfter additional verification, signs of fraud were detected (duplicate IP addresses, minimal deposits, low gaming activity).
Unfortunately, with such indicators, we cannot confirm payment for this traffic under our terms of cooperation.â
Betwarts fraud, rejection.
"The traffic appears unnatural, with players from identical IP subnets and all players having similar deposit amounts of â¬30â40. Furthermore, only 15 players made a second deposit, but showed no further activity thereafter. Not a single player has made a third deposit; the average total bet is â¬38. Such traffic is fraudulent and will not be paid out."
Spinational HU fraud, rejection
"Players with identical IP addresses and subnets. The average bet is â¬37; out of 25 players, only 10% (3 players) made a repeat deposit; the rest are inactive. This type of traffic is not eligible for payment"
Winbeatz, Manekispin fraud, rejection
«These accounts exhibit consistent behavioral patterns, including registrations within a short timeframe, the use of suspicious email addresses, minimal account activity, no re-deposits, and low wagering levels. They show one-time logins and share a similar IP tree+Proxy VPN usage. Additionally, the accounts share similar payment methods and demonstrate limited gameplay, typically involving a single deposit and low bonus engagement. Altogether, these factors strongly suggest a coordinated pattern consistent with CPA-driven activity.»
As you can see, this is not an "excuse" - it is a systematic position from independent advertisers who lose money on such traffic.
You repeatedly claimed that you generate organic SEO traffic. However:
Your website is indexed for only 3 keywords;
Only 4 articles have been published and indexed;
Similarweb cannot collect data on your site due to insufficient traffic.
All of this is confirmed by the screenshots you can see at the link below:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1vtZQ0f1fxDNcp_7iFgbmX2D_P977e78S?usp=drive_link
This level of activity cannot physically generate the volume of leads you claimed. This is not a subjective opinion - it is data from objective analytics systems.
We never refuse to meet our obligations without a valid reason. On the contrary, we value every honest partner and always go the extra mile. Throughout our cooperation, we paid you over $10,000 without delay - right up until the moment when advertisers began mass-rejecting your traffic for reasons that leave no doubt about its fraudulent nature.
Unfortunately, we cannot pay for fraud - neither our own nor that of our partners. Doing so would violate our agreements with advertisers and put the entire network at risk.
When a partner hides their real traffic generation method, presents low-quality or outright fraudulent leads as organic traffic, and then leaves a negative review after being refused payment - that is unfair business practice.
We remain open to dialogue and are willing to reconsider our decision if you provide irrefutable proof of your traffic quality (for example, full analytics on traffic sources, user behavior, etc.). For now, we only have mass fraud reports from multiple advertisers and the screenshot data - which, unfortunately, do not support your position.
Sincerely,
The Magic Click Partners Team
