Disappointed with the Chargeback Decision Despite Delivery Proof
We are extremely disappointed with Sutton Bank's handling of a Visa chargeback on behalf of a customer.
The carrier tracking showed the package as “Delivered, Door/Yard” at the customer's delivery address. Despite providing delivery evidence, the chargeback was decided in the customer's favour under the “Product Not Received” reason code.
This situation raises serious concerns about potential fraudulent claims. When a customer claims that an order was never received despite tracking confirming delivery, it is deeply frustrating for a legitimate business to suffer the financial loss.
We believe that such claims should be investigated thoroughly before a decision is made. Merchants should not be left unprotected when customers may be abusing the chargeback system to obtain refunds while their orders have been marked as delivered.
We are not suggesting that every non-delivery claim is fraudulent, but this case highlights how easily merchants can be left bearing the consequences of a disputed delivery.
We urge Sutton Bank to ensure a fairer and more transparent dispute resolution process that properly considers merchants' evidence and protects businesses against potentially fraudulent chargeback claims.








