DO Not rent from Tricon they will keep your entire deposit
We rented 809 N 95th Pl, Mesa, AZ for two years, and our experience was extremely disappointing from start to finish.
We were required to pay a $600 nonârefundable pet fee on top of a monthly pet charge. We also paid for a âsmart home systemâ that never worked once during our entire lease.
They kept over $1600.00 of our refundable security deposit
From the very first walkthrough, we pointed out serious issues:
⢠untreated and warped wood fencing with nails sticking through
⢠a weak front door and a rattling, very old sliding door
⢠no dryer vent
The representative told us directly that they âwouldnât spend the moneyâ to fix the doors or make proper repairs.
Within months, the exterior paint began peeling off the house in sheets, blowing across the yard and neighborhood. We called repeatedly. Months later, they finally sent an unmarked truck with what appeared to be an unlicensed painter who brought his kids with him. We were left to clean up all the paint chips ourselves.
The flooring peeled up in the bathroom and bedroom. When the second walkthrough happened after a year, we again showed the fencing issues, nails sticking out toward the neighborâs yard, the failing doors, the missing dryer vent, and the nonâfunctional smart home system. No one ever followed up. No repairs were ever made.
Our neighborâs dogs repeatedly got under the fence and attacked our dogs because the fence was so warped. We had to spend our own money on a noâdig barrier, a gate, and a screen door just to keep our pets safe and secure.
After moving out, they returned only $100 of our deposit. First they claimed it was due to âflooring damage,â but when questioned, they changed the story and said it was because the interior âneeded repaintingâ and that the paint supposedly had After moving out, they returned only $86 of our deposit. First they claimed it was due to âflooring damage,â but when questioned, they changed the story and said it was because the interior âneeded repaintingâ and that the paint supposedly had a â5âyear warrantyâ we were responsible for. This makes no sense, especially since the walls already had visible patch jobs underneath the paint when we moved in, and one of those old patches literally opened up when we moved our couch.
We did not receive proper repairs, proper communication, or a fair deposit return. They kept all but $100
The only positive thing I can say is that the A/C worked well.
I would not recommend renting this property or working with this management company based on our experience.
4/22/26 Update to your response:You were informed of all the issues during your inspections, yet your inspection staff never followed up or addressed any of the problems we reported. It is unreasonable for you to claim that interior paint carries a â5âyear warrantyâ before a tenant moves in, especially when this was never disclosed in advance. We live in the desert, with a mostly dirt and rock lot, and the interior would not require repainting due to anything we did. If I were a new tenant, I would reasonably expect fresh paint, not paint already failing.
Additionally:
The exterior paint began peeling off in sheets within months of moveâin.
The exterior is peeling again now, which clearly indicates poor workmanship or lowâquality materials.
Repainting after two years is normal wear and tear, not tenant damage, and falls under the landlordâs responsibility under Arizona law.
We shouldn't be charged almost a $1000 for repainting a living room
2026幎4æ21æ¥
èªçºçãªã¬ãã¥ãŒ