レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら

レビュアヌのコメントを芋おみたしょう

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Water aid advert is insulting and deeply patronising. It is inaccurate. No parent will their child water that it is known can kill. We collect rain water, we boil and sieve contaminated water before u... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち2の評䟡

The advert is ridiculous, what will improve viewers thoughts and support is if we see an updated advert. Not one saying about installing pumps and taps and sh. Make an advert showing thhe people actua... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち5の評䟡

Otroligt viktig organisation! MÃ¥nga tar rent vatten för givet, med för miljontals mÀnniskor vÀrlden över Àr det en lyx. Henom att stödja Wateraid bidrar man till att ge föer mÀnniskoe wn bÀttre framti... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Having visited several countries in Africa in person, I have never seen a child drink dirty water as seen on your TV adverts.. African mothers wouldn’t allow this, you people have no idea, don’t fo... もっず芋る

䌁業情報

  1. チャリティヌ

圓該䌁業による蚘述

WaterAid's history stretches back to 1981, when on 21 July we were officially established as a charitable trust. In the last 30 years, we have gone from strength to strength to become one of the most respected organisations dealing solely with water, sanitation and hygiene issues. Your money and support has also helped us to influence policy and practice to ensure that the vital role of water, hygiene and sanitation in reducing poverty is recognised globally.


連絡先

2.1

期埅以䞋

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の2

79件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

ネガティブなレビュヌに回答しおいたせん

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Shameful

Awful advertising and quite clearly a scam. I would not give them a single penny of my money and the cameraman, Mike Craven-Todd and all of the other people that put their name to this should be ashamed of themselves.

2024幎5月5日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Corrupt charity

Corrupt charity. Stealing people's money. Taking water out of children's mouths. Somebody shut this sh*tshow down. You all should be embarrassed that 1 man could do what a whole charity couldn't do for years. What a shame.

2024幎4月7日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Every year a price rise

Another year and another price rise, when will it stop,
( I don't think it will).
Also the annual begging appeal for water aid,
52 MILLION pounds a MONTH,
So where has all the money gone.!!!?.
Directors are on
£75,943 year so yes they need your money to keep coming in to continue their comfortable life style,
Take a look at their bad reviews,

2024幎3月1日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

This is a terrible so called charity


This is a terrible so called charity that is nothing more than a money making business, a begging charity that has multi million pound reserves with extremely rich CEO’s. Their projects have been ongoing for longer than I can remember and STILL they say they need to do more, any other business model would have given up after realising what they propose is undeliverable and pie in the sky thinking.
This business model is nothing more than a money maker that depends on the vulnerability of certain people in society, it needs closing down and any advertising blocked.

2024幎2月6日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

We all know this water aid is not


We all know this water aid is not washing with the people around the world,come clean water aid.
Just like to say ‘these countries do have resources like gold diamond and other things
”It’s just a case of the selfish rich using the poor to make a lot of work at full price.

2024幎2月5日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Sack The Management

Sack the management and get British older business volunteers. Audit all the accounts forensically. And review the reality of where all this money went, and ask the question why the target government are not supplying the needs of their children. There are professional film people in South America, who make films of starving actors, who are good actors, and anyone can buy the same films as water aid show, that's another point to think about. The whopping salaries ! I am not sure whether the amount in the balance sheet is multiplied by 000 but is it 26 Million a year? I still believe that charity should start in the home.

2023幎6月24日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

if I could give this advert a 0 I


if I could give this advert a 0 I would. The plonker who narrates it says they have no choice , they do have a choice stop making babies . Stop begging. if they are human they should learn that if the infrastructure is not there to support kids don't make them. But it's a white supremist thing, they want to show that white people are rich and will still look after peoples of Africa which is richer than the UK any day of the week. Using children to exploit in begging adverts. Its not the Whole of africa , they are responsible for maintaining their country. The money does not get there , too much corruption.

2023幎2月17日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

I met a man in my line of work who goes


I met a man in my line of work who goes to countries to get them water pumps installed....his uncle a doctor pays for it at a cost of £400 to get a small town water ..I'm not sure what this company spends it's money on.im.getting sick and tired of money spent on UK advertising to get money to spend it abroad and for salaries. Anyone know of a charity abroad that helps UK people who also suffer ?

2022幎10月31日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

40+ years of this charity taking


40+ years of this charity taking hundreds of millions upon millions of pounds and still we see the same adverts on tv telling us the same stuff.
I mean what have they been doing for the last 40 years with the money raised? When manager is paid £120'000 wage how is this classed as a charity? Its one big con tugging on good peoples heart strings.

2022幎9月20日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Absolutely disgusting that they are


Absolutely disgusting that they are allowed to continue as a charity. They are a business who use the proceeds to fund a lifestyle. With the CEO on a 6 figure salary as with all charity’s. They have never ever stepped foot in Africa or observed what’s going on. I have opened a petition on Downing Street to stop these charities. Please sign.

2022幎6月8日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

What a pack of scam artists !!

What a pack of scam artists !!! Uncontactable if you want to cancel your donations, they just keep taking the money until you close your bank account. Small percentage of funds go to Wateraid projects [and newsletters], the rest is "business costs." If you want to make a significant difference with your donations, choose another "Charity."

2022幎4月20日
自発的なレビュヌ

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

䌁業は、自動招埅を介しおレビュヌを䟝頌するこずができたす。この方法で埗られたレビュヌは、本物の経隓に基づいたものであり、確認枈みのラベルが付䞎されたす。

他の皮類のレビュヌに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報