レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら

レビュアヌのコメントを芋おみたしょう

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Water aid advert is insulting and deeply patronising. It is inaccurate. No parent will their child water that it is known can kill. We collect rain water, we boil and sieve contaminated water before u... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち2の評䟡

The advert is ridiculous, what will improve viewers thoughts and support is if we see an updated advert. Not one saying about installing pumps and taps and sh. Make an advert showing thhe people actua... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち5の評䟡

Otroligt viktig organisation! MÃ¥nga tar rent vatten för givet, med för miljontals mÀnniskor vÀrlden över Àr det en lyx. Henom att stödja Wateraid bidrar man till att ge föer mÀnniskoe wn bÀttre framti... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Having visited several countries in Africa in person, I have never seen a child drink dirty water as seen on your TV adverts.. African mothers wouldn’t allow this, you people have no idea, don’t fo... もっず芋る

䌁業情報

  1. チャリティヌ

圓該䌁業による蚘述

WaterAid's history stretches back to 1981, when on 21 July we were officially established as a charitable trust. In the last 30 years, we have gone from strength to strength to become one of the most respected organisations dealing solely with water, sanitation and hygiene issues. Your money and support has also helped us to influence policy and practice to ensure that the vital role of water, hygiene and sanitation in reducing poverty is recognised globally.


連絡先

2.1

期埅以䞋

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の2

79件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

ネガティブなレビュヌに回答しおいたせん

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

ITS A BUSINESS NOT A CHARITY!

ITS A BUSINESS NOT A CHARITY!
If you want to help poverty, start by researching.
Realize buying and eating fish is causing poverty. Eating animal products is consuming more water than we imagine.
Water is being used for livestock animals before the people (also causing poverty) and mostly everybodys money is given to the wrong businesses.
If you really want to help people over the world who don't have water then try NGO organisations. They're very genuine and you get the choice to join and actually help them in other countries.

2022幎1月27日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

It’s one of the biggest financial scams


It’s one of the biggest financial scams around, their claims on their fake ads are absurd, their claims are not recognized by any country “ receiving” help, the countries that they claim to work in use foreign aid to provide infrastructure which is monitored by the World Health Organization and have no such water issues or see a health crisis of children dying at one every couple of minutes. Save your money, your only making scammers richer. Maybe this fake organization would like to publish its accounts and show the completed installations they’ve done, and I’m not talking about putting a new tap on an existing potable water pipe.

2021幎10月25日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Astounded to receive this with my water


Astounded to receive this with my water bill, from a company whose annual profits could cover the total they are asking for. There is a global commodification of water, turning it from a necessity of life into something people have to pay for. Here in the UK there is a regional monopoly of water provision and it is illegal to capture and purify your own domestic water from rainwater. This is a case of gaslighting pure and simple, trying to shift the blame, guilt and expense of global water redistribution to big profit-driven business corporations onto us the captive consumers. Shameful and unacceptable! Sending the pamphlet back to my water co's headquarters in the post suggesting they take donation from their shareholders and directors, not us.

2021幎4月19日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Very forceful tactics

Was pounced on by one of their "sales goons" a while back inside Homebase. Refused point blank to take no for an answer and even started following me out of the shop when I was heading to my car!

I told him at least 10 times that I didn't want to donate anything but he still insisted and kept trying to block me moving. In the end I decided to waste his time like he had wasted mine. I went through all the forms with him, gave him the bank details for a bank I no longer used. He then insisted I signed up for their £1 a day thing (a bit different to the advertised £2 a month!)

I literally went through everything as I didn't use the bank account and I would also cancel the Direct Debit as soon as it got set-up as well just to be certain. My advice is if you are ever pounced upon by these fools, do what I did if you can't get away from them!

2020幎12月8日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち5の評䟡

Wateraid har utnÀmnts till vÀrldens


Wateraid har utnÀmnts till vÀrldens frÀmsta icke-vinstdrivande organisation inom området vatten och sanitet, vilket kÀnns bra.

Bakom utnÀmningen står den oberoende forskningsorganisationen Philanthropedia. 82 experter inom området vatten och sanitet tillfrågades om vilken global organisation de tycker gör störst skillnad inom vatten och sanitet. De tillfrågade var forskare, lÀrare, journalister och beslutsfattare, identifierade 16 organisationer som arbetar med vattenfrågor. Experterna utvÀrderade sedan organisationerna utifrån deras möjlighet och förmåga att göra skillnad, vad de ansåg vara organisationernas styrka och hur organisationerna ytterligare kan förbÀttras.

Wateraid hamnade på första plats. På andra plats kom Water for People och på tredje plats IRC Wash.

Kan varmt rekommendera WaterAid.

2020幎7月28日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Wateraid directors couldn't run an


Wateraid directors couldn't run an empty shop. Apart from so called celebs asking the poor to give while being paid £10,000 plus. In Uganda alone over 56% of the work is broken or in disrepair. Buying cheap pumps and equipment, then expecting the village to maintain the rubbish. Not one part of any process they carry out is adequate, apart from their ability to spend vast amounts on wages, hotels, food, flights, and not only lining their pockets but those of the company's, and directors they use to scam your money. Over 60,000 units in Africa are broken and this isn't the only company doing it

2019幎12月26日
自発的なレビュヌ

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

䌁業は、自動招埅を介しおレビュヌを䟝頌するこずができたす。この方法で埗られたレビュヌは、本物の経隓に基づいたものであり、確認枈みのラベルが付䞎されたす。

他の皮類のレビュヌに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報