レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら

2.8

たあたあ

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の3

3件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

レビュヌ䟝頌の蚘録がありたせん

この䌁業は顧客にレビュヌを䟝頌しおいないため、レビュヌが党䜓の意芋を反映しおいない可胜性がありたす。

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

2.8

すべおのレビュヌ

(3)

過去12か月のレビュヌ数: 3ä»¶

レビュヌを曞く

レビュヌの確認を行いたす

Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Shame I can’t rate it nil star

Shame I can’t rate it nil star don’t put your trust in this company as we have .my sister made a will with them I know this because my self and my wife were with her at the time we also made new wills. The sad time has come for me to pick up her will to be told they have no record of it ( they have mine and my wife’s) after months of dealing with Andrew Barnett with no satisfaction at all he has more or less said we made it up that is the most upsetting thing about this whole business we are not liars if they had held there hands up and said yes the will was made but we can’t find it I would have taken that but after over six months to say they have no record of her ever going if that is the case the power of attorney done at same time was there!,unless you want a load of stress do not use this company or you will end up at the s r a like I am having to do I am going to take our wills out of storage with them they be safer in shoe box under the bed

2026幎6月23日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Woolliscrofts solicitors - do not use!!!

WOOLLISCROFTS SOLICITORS - INCOMPETENT and UNPROFESSIONAL -

The following refers to Woolliscrofts Solicitors based in Hanley and Stone,S-O-T. The three solicitors named are all still working at Woolliscrofts Solicitors.
My father-in-law sadly passed away on 29/10/25. My husband, as Executor of his father’s estate, contacted Woolliscrofts Solicitors who held the Will and secured their next earliest appointment, which was on 14/11/25 with a Mr Andrew Willott, his sole intention being to collect the Will for the purpose of the Grant of Probate Application. At this appointment it was discovered that a ‘typo’ existed on my father-in-law’s will, which had to be addressed before the Grant of Probate could be processed. To address this issue, we were advised that a letter needed to be drafted by Woolliscrofts Solicitors, which would then accompany the Will along with other necessary paperwork required for the Grant of Probate process.
We subsequently discovered that this letter had to be signed by Ms Caroline Carnes, the Solicitor who had drawn up the Will and counter signed by another solicitor whose role was to witness this signature. As the error was originally due to Woolliscrofts Solicitors they apologised and stated it would be given their highest priority and dealt with immediately. Perhaps therefore, you can imagine our frustration that as of 26/01/26 this letter is yet to materialise, despite numerous phone calls, emails and even guaranteed assurances that this letter would in the post by 23/12/25; this shockingly was complete untrue, Woolliscrofts Solicitors had deliberately misled us. On 23/12/25 we now know the letter had not even been signed let alone posted, indeed we have subsequently discovered that it has not been signed as of our last communication with them on 18/01/26 and frankly I even have my reservations if the letter has been drawn up at all, despite and I quote, being told that all parties are “
aware of the need for this matter to receive attention as expeditiously as possible”. Initially, despite our numerous phone calls to inquire on the progress of this matter and having been given assurances that we would be contacted with an update, we were never phoned back, except the once just before Christmas to give us false information about the letter being posted. Eventually, we started to send emails to which we have had replies. A Mr Andrew Barnett has picked up and responded to our emails, not with direct answers to our queries, but with long rambling emails giving long winded excuses which in short could have simply said, ‘we have done nothing and are no further forward!!’ I have therefore, decided to post my experience and dealings with Woolliscrofts Solicitors.
Woolliscrofts Solicitors have themselves suggested that our situation will be addressed by their internal complaints department, but frankly if this department works to the same time scale, I dread to think how long we will be waiting for a resolution. I am therefore, hopeful that armed with the knowledge that their utter incompetence and lack of providing a professional service, along with their inability to remedy their own mistakes at pace is now in the public arena and will be regularly updated with any progress, may give them the proverbial ‘kick up the behind’ that is obviously needed and we will see a resolution to this matter. One can but hope! But more importantly we want to give perspective to potential customers and provide a full picture of the kind of service they can expect, if they choose to use Woolliscrofts Solicitors to represent them for all those important legal matters, where competent, capable professionals are required and not those who make mistakes, then fail to correct them in a timely manner or indeed with any sense of urgency, but simply provide excuse after excuse for their incompetence and still do nothing.
I will keep you updated on our progress. I have also emailed a copy of this posting to the Ombudsman for Solicitors.

2026幎1月28日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Pick another firm I was in 2 minds as


Pick another firm I was in 2 minds as to whether to use Wooliscrofts, or another firm. How I wish I’d made a different decision. Wooliscrofts have been totally inadequate in their services surrounding my family court case. They are unable to take ownership of mistakes and instead choose to provide excuses when said errors are uncovered rather than resolve things by taking accountability. When ceasing the agreement with Wooliscrofts, they were advised to liaise with my partner rather than myself who was the subject of the case and in an extremely vulnerable condition. Instead, Wooliscroft not only chose to completely ignore this request, but proceeded to continue to hound myself for completed forms despite having my partner's contact details and having been asked to communicate with him, which has caused significant emotional damage to me at an already difficult time. Wooliscrofts have proven to be nothing short of glorified administration assistants.

Following my review of Wooliscrofts on another site, and my formal complaint; the firm actually used the formal complaint response to not only highlight in yellow, but in caps lock also, that I should consider my own review inappropriate & should take it down. This firm cares only about image and not taking care of their clients, and the reviews they consider ‘appropriate’ are only those which praise them. The complaint will now be escalated to the Legal Ombudsman.

2025幎5月23日
自発的なレビュヌ

レビュヌの察象になっおいる䌁業の方ぞ

プロフィヌルを登録しお、Trustpilot の無料ビゞネス ツヌルにアクセスし、お客様ずの぀ながりを広げおください。

無料アカりントを取埗

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報