Leicester Autohaus (also trading as Midlands Autohaus)
In December 2025, my husband and I travelled approximately 110 miles to view a vehicle after arranging an appointment by telephone. Upon our arrival, we were informed that the vehicle was not yet at the agreed location because it was still being transported. We were politely asked if we could wait for around 20 minutes, which was not an issue for us.
After 20 minutes, the vehicle had still not arrived. When we asked again, we were reassured that it would be arriving shortly and were asked for a little more patience. After waiting for approximately one hour, a recovery truck arrived carrying what turned out to be the vehicle we had travelled to see.
During our inspection, we identified several issues with the vehicle. The more significant issues included a damaged sunroof rail, which prevented the sunroof from closing properly, and water present in the boot. We also noticed less significant faults, including faulty parking sensors at both the front and rear.
The salesperson assured us that all of these issues would be repaired before the vehicle was delivered to us. On the basis of those assurances, we decided to proceed with the purchase. At that stage, the staff appeared friendly, helpful and professional, and communication was very good. Unfortunately, this was not our experience after the sale.
On the agreed delivery date, we were informed that delivery would be delayed by several hours. As a result, the vehicle did not arrive until between approximately 11:00 p.m. and midnight. As soon as it was unloaded, we inspected it to confirm that the agreed repairs had been completed.
To our disappointment, none of the previously agreed repairs had been carried out. In addition, the vehicle was delivered without the V5C registration document. Because of the late hour, we were unable to contact the dealership immediately, but we did so first thing the following morning.
Initially, our telephone call was answered, and we were asked to email photographs of the outstanding issues. We did this promptly. From that point onwards, however, communication became increasingly difficult. Telephone calls were often unanswered, and responses to emails took a considerable amount of time.
Regarding the sunroof fault, we were asked to obtain an inspection and repair estimate from a local registered garage. We arranged this on the same day and forwarded the written quotation to the dealership immediately. We were then informed that the estimated repair cost exceeded what they had expected. The dealership proposed collecting the vehicle using their own recovery truck but could not provide any indication of when it would be collected or returned.
As this was our family's only vehicle and we have a young child, we were not in a position to agree to an open-ended collection with no estimated return date. Shortly afterwards, we were informed that, after speaking with their own garage, they believed the sunroof had already been repaired and suggested that the fault may have occurred again during transport or while the vehicle was being inspected.
At that stage, my husband and I decided that, for the sake of avoiding further stress and delay, we would arrange and pay for the repairs ourselves and consider the matter closed.
As part exchange of the transaction, we traded in our previous vehicle. Following an inspection, we were informed that, due to its condition and known faults, it would not be offered for retail sale but would instead be sent to auction. We appreciated this, as we believed the vehicle was not suitable to be sold for normal road use without appropriate repairs.
Some time later, out of curiosity, we checked the vehicle's MOT history using its registration number. We noted that it had subsequently passed an MOT and that the issues we were aware of did not appear to be reflecte
When we visited the dealership, we noticed a number of vehicles parked on double yellow lines outside the premises. Our part exchange vehicle was also left there after we handed it over. As the registered keeper had not yet been updated with the DVLA at that stage, we later received correspondence regarding a Penalty Charge Notice relating to that vehicle.
I initially contacted the dealership in an attempt to resolve the matter. Unfortunately, I was left feeling that my concerns were not taken seriously during that conversation. I was also informed that if I removed a previous review I had posted on Auto Trader, they would consider helping to resolve the issue. I can only report this as my recollection of the conversation.
As we were unable to resolve the matter directly, we contacted Leicester City Council. The liability for the Penalty Charge Notice was redirected.