レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら

2.7

期埅以䞋

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の2.5

5件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

レビュヌ䟝頌の蚘録がありたせん

この䌁業は顧客にレビュヌを䟝頌しおいないため、レビュヌが党䜓の意芋を反映しおいない可胜性がありたす。

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

2.7

すべおのレビュヌ

(5)

過去12か月のレビュヌ数: 1ä»¶

レビュヌを曞く

レビュヌの確認を行いたす

Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Absolutely shocking experience

Absolutely shocking experience. Last year, I paid to have Justine represent me in a family court case. I tried to contact Justine on multiple occasions and was told, she was unavailable.

From this, I did not have much faith in Justine, and to my shock horror, she was unable to attend court. We directed Justine for the hours advice, as we knew we had paid for her service.

What we did not know, is if you pay to direct a Barrister and that Barrister is unavailable, another Barrister will attend in their place.

That is all well and good but we paid for Justine, that’s why we paid for the hour. Not a random Barrister who has nothing to do with the case.

I put in a complaint, and they disregarded any responsibility. I would honestly stay clear and find a more trusting Barristers Chambers.

2025幎6月9日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Completely unprofessional

My personal experience with this company was very negative.

I paid for services from Jonathan Rees-Morgan, but the work was not completed after he withdrew part-way through, citing “professional embarrassment.” At the next court hearing, the other party was represented by Lucas Maxted-Page, which I personally felt could present a conflict of interest and raise confidentiality concerns. During negotiations, Mr Maxted-Page ended our call part-way through, explaining that he “has kids here and need to sort them,” which I found unprofessional in the circumstances.

When I raised my concerns with the company, the complaints manager, J-P Schlutz, categorised my complaint as vexatious. In my opinion, this approach made it difficult for me to have my concerns addressed.

2025幎8月14日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Review of Kingsleigh Viollet - College Chambers

I had an unfortunate experience with Kingsleigh Viollet during a recent family law court proceeding as a McKenzie friend. Regrettably, my interactions with him left much to be desired.

Firstly, his behaviour in the waiting room was concerning. Instead of respecting the privacy and emotional state of those present, he continued to ask intrusive questions, creating an uncomfortable atmosphere. This lack of professionalism escalated further when he interrupted my client mid-sentence on four occasions, causing distress and alarm.

Moreover, I found it inappropriate that he addressed my representative by their first name, undermining the formality and seriousness of the family law proceedings. This casual approach felt disrespectful and unprofessional.

Most troubling, however, was his conduct during the court proceedings. Kingsleigh displayed a tendency to misrepresent facts, which was not only misleading but could have serious implications for the case. His actions raised questions about his integrity and commitment to a fair process.

In summary, my experience with Kingsleigh Viollet was deeply disappointing. His lack of professionalism, respect, and honesty is something I cannot overlook. I would not recommend his services to anyone seeking reliable legal support in family law matters.

2025幎7月4日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Barrister (Ms Akther) lied to the Judge


Barrister (Ms Tahnia Akther) lied to the Judge in court multiple times and made up her own story on the spot - which bore zero resemblance to the truth. This is perjury - a criminal offence - which I assume is the usual modus operandi of this crooked shyster.

2023幎2月7日
自発的なレビュヌ

レビュヌの察象になっおいる䌁業の方ぞ

プロフィヌルを登録しお、Trustpilot の無料ビゞネス ツヌルにアクセスし、お客様ずの぀ながりを広げおください。

無料アカりントを取埗

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報