レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら

レビュアヌのコメントを芋おみたしょう

5぀星のうち5の評䟡

We had a problem with our conservatory roof when it dropped about 2 Inches. The company that I stalled it went bust just days after I reported the fault. I contacted DGCOS and at their request I... もっず芋る

䌁業が回答したした

5぀星のうち5の評䟡

DGCOS came and changed our condensation windows! P&P window company who installed the windows went bankrupt. We found DGCOS complaints department very supportive, even though the whole process was st... もっず芋る

䌁業が回答したした

5぀星のうち5の評䟡

Great visit from the representative who took the trouble to explain everything showing me the quality I would eventually get. Fair price. Barry came and measured up when he did his survey and was a... もっず芋る

䌁業が回答したした

5぀星のうち5の評䟡

Excellent process from start to finish all backed by a cast iron guarantee. Estimator listened to my requirements and made suggestions to improve them. Installers were polite, friendly and carried... もっず芋る

䌁業が回答したした

䌁業情報

  1. 䜏たい・ガヌデニング

圓該䌁業による蚘述

The Double Glazing & Conservatory Ombudsman Scheme is a consumer protection organisation designed to bring peace of mind to homeowners.


連絡先

4.8

優良

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の5

111件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

最近のレビュヌ䟝頌の蚘録はありたせん

この䌁業は最近、顧客にレビュヌを䟝頌しおいないため、レビュヌが党䜓の意芋を反映しおいない可胜性がありたす。

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

この䌁業を閲芧した人は、以䞋の䌁業も閲芧しおいたす。

4.8

すべおのレビュヌ

(111)

過去12か月のレビュヌ数: 1ä»¶

レビュヌを曞く
Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

NOT A CONSUMER OMBUDSMAN OF VALUE

This organisation pretends to give protection to the consumer but the reality is they represent the industry first and foremost.

When I had a problem with one of their 'members' I followed their guidance and protocols to the letter, using keywords from their website, but within a short while of lodging a complaint against the firm in question they had passed judgement in favour of them. It would appear that whilst I was following the proper procedures the firm in question did not and already had them pass judgement before I made contact with the DGCOS.

It took a legal representative (with evidence I presented the DGCOS) less than a day to get the firm in question to admit liability, which is what I was led to believe the DGCOS would do.

Don't waste your time employing firms that use the DGCOS as a selling point, for us they appeared as dishonest and corrupt as the firm's they represent.

2021幎9月17日
自発的なレビュヌ
DGCOS ロゎ

DGCOS からの回答

Good afternoon,

Thank you for sharing your feedback. We sincerely apologise for any negative experience you may have had with DGCOS. Your concerns are important to us, and we take them seriously. Our team is dedicated to providing excellent service, and we would welcome the chance to address your concerns directly. Please contact our customer support team on info@dgcos.org.uk if you wish to discuss this.

Best regards, DGCOS

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Confused and Disappointing results

After having the DGCOS involved with a window install which we had problems with. At first, I thought great things may improve this couldn't be further from the truth. After seven months of phone calls and emails, they were unable to resolve the problems we have with one of their Members. I was told we can't give you any advice nor could they enforce anything they were dealing with. If only I was told this in the first place then I wouldn't have wasted so much time and energy. I really don't see the need for such a service other than to lure customers to think they have some kind of security. I never wanted nor needed someone to speak on my behalf I'm well capable to do that myself. In all, if you want someone to talk too then great. As when Id had enough of being messed around by one of their members they washed their hands of the case. So a big thank you to the staff for being so polite and understanding. Sorry, I can't give you more stars because I really wanted to but my issue with one of your members is still ongoing nearly 14 months on and still not resolved.
So a quick update I had a director of the DGCOS involved who wanted to have a virtual meeting with one of their members on the 22nd of February and when I didn't hear back I decided to give them a call only to find out he is no longer a Director and has moved on. So to say I'm disappointed is an understatement as no one has got back to me.

2020幎12月17日
自発的なレビュヌ
DGCOS ロゎ

DGCOS からの回答

Hi Anth Wood, we are sorry to hear you are having ongoing issues. Please email us at info@dgcos.org.uk and we will escalate this to a Director for review for you. Kind regards, DGCOS.

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Living Nightmare, two and a half years and counting

As our first attempt at home improvement, a conservatory (July 18) we chose a DGCOS member as it seemed to offer unrivalled protection, practically a failsafe. Two and a half years on and I am the fight of my life. There are simply no words to describe the subcontractor used by the member to lay our footings (I must add that 2 years later even it's legality is being challenged). I did attempt to engage with DGCOS on further issues but their performance lacked any conviction and did not resolve my issue at the time. Move forward to spring 19 and a large crack appears, this causes problems which have not been solved and continue to affect it's primary functions. Based on professional building advice I requested that my footings be underpinned, at first this was rejected by the member, I then went to Which (because of my initial experience with DCGOS) and pursued a dispute resolution ombudsman. In short the member then agreed to undertake works based on the outcome. DRO confirmed works were needed but actually ruled in favour by way of full refund. At this point (Apr 20) the member had entered administration and ceased trading so no opportunity to enforce ruling. Surely no problem as I have been issued this amazing insurance backed guarantee. As I understood this assumes responsibility of the ceased members ability to resolve. Unfortunately not, it is not turning out as expected and in no way has been an easy process for me. I have contacted DGCOS and made them aware but there was no appetite to get involved or to review who supplies their insurance backed guarantee for future customers, the word sorry was mentioned so of course this completely fixes everything. Two and a half years in, what protection did I really receive, did their endorsement or promise of insurance simply give dishonest members the tools to take advantage of consumers, it certainly had me duped. In a time of increased focus on mental health, mine has suffered because of this, stress, anxiety, sleepless nights. future customers beware. 14/01/20 I have complained to DGCOS who as per the reply have composed a brief response not addressing the actions of their vetted member. To play a large crack down and a product ruled not fit for purpose by a dispute resolution ombudsman as 'some outstanding issues' shows everything you need to know. The financial ombudsman can only rule on a specific complaint (wording is extremely important as I am learning) and future complaints may follow, it is not the same as the DRO who send their own inspoector and reveiw the situation as a whole. The insurance have easily discreditted the DRO which shocks me. The fact that an insurance product purchased by DGCOS who rely on an ombudsman, can simply be brushed aside, contadicts the whole process and should worry future customers. My reality is one of awkward well constructed responses by organisations that really do not have my best interests at heart. An IBG for me is simply now a deterant and the DGCOS name / logo can not guarantee the quality of who you are letting into your home. My close neighbour at the same time, built an extension (20m apart from each other), used an architect who advised on all the permissions needed and ensured it was done properly through planning and building regs.Their footing are deeper and thicker than mine unsurprisingly They are enjoying their investment, I am simply regretting mine as the legality has been questioned and may equate to crippling expense should I pursue which the IBG will not suport. You decide who you want to be. DGCOS you are simply a disappointment.

2020幎11月25日
自発的なレビュヌ
DGCOS ロゎ

DGCOS からの回答

Thank you for your feedback. We have also written to you. DGCOS purchased on your behalf an insurance policy to cover necessary remedial works in the event the installer ceases to trade and is unable to honor the terms of their written guarantee. In this case the installer did unfortunately cease to trade leaving you with some outstanding issues. We have spoken to Safe World Insurance Group (UK) Ltd (Safe World) and are satisfied that they have considered your claim in line with the policy Terms and Conditions and have made an appropriate suggestion to further assess and if necessary resolve the issue for you, although you do not feel that the solution proposed is to your satisfaction. We can see that you have taken the matter to the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) and they confirmed that they don’t think Safe World have acted unfairly. We understand that you are proposing to provide FOS with further information, which you feel will result in them further reviewing your complaint.

5぀星のうち4の評䟡

Stuck with it

After dealing direct with the installation company and then 3 bouts of mediation using DGCOS as well as the global pandemic, we finally got a resolution in the form of a refund.
From install to refund it was 16 months, 11 involving DGCOS but we wouldn't have "won" without their help.
Throughout Tracey handled our case and put up with my own impatience brilliantly, offering advise as to the process and ways forward.

2020幎8月5日
自発的なレビュヌ
DGCOS ロゎ

DGCOS からの回答

Thank you for your review, Graham. We are glad we could help. Kind regards, DGCOS.

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

The DGCOS is not a reliable organisation

We were a founder member of the DGCOS but no longer wish to have anything to do with this organisation. After the DGCOS’s own “consumer backup” insurance company went into liquidation (which caused chaos for both its own members and consumers) we found the DGCOS service to both us as a business and also to the consumer went from bad to worse. After complaining to them about the way they managed things the DGCOS Management were extremely rude and unhelpful. Following our complaint to them we received a letter expelling us from their organisation. Ironic really, considering they are a dispute resolution service. Clearly they don’t like or accept complaints about their staff or service. Following this, despite several requests for a response from Richard Christie the DGCOS MD we have never had the courtesy of a resonable explanation. Funny enough, despite hearing from 3 of the DGCOS staff who confirm we are actually one of their best company’s...(luckily for us we record all telephone calls so we have this on record). We have a very long standing history which including serving several thousands of customers and we have always acted honestly and fairly (unlike the DGCOS it seems). Their mediation service does not work and the Omudsmen service that follows needs continual chasing to get any type of answer for a business or the consumer. This is a awful organisation and I strongly recommend any business looking into protecting their clients use another service such as the GGF / GGFi and I recommend consumers don’t rely on the DGCOS service.

2019幎3月31日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち5の評䟡

What a great company

What a great company, really helped me when the company I used for my conservatory went bust. Lovely people who sorted everything out for me, couldn't be happier. Thanks DGCOS.

2018幎8月10日
自発的なレビュヌ

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報