レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら

2.9

たあたあ

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の3

3件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

レビュヌ䟝頌の蚘録がありたせん

この䌁業は顧客にレビュヌを䟝頌しおいないため、レビュヌが党䜓の意芋を反映しおいない可胜性がありたす。

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

2.9

すべおのレビュヌ

(3)

過去12か月のレビュヌ数: 0ä»¶

レビュヌを曞く

レビュヌの確認を行いたす

Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Solicitors prefer to not do things by the book.

Go careful, DNLAW think that doing things by the book is “Troublesome”.

Recently after requesting a copy of my data under GDPR2018, in the small amount of text that wasn’t redacted, (complete paragraphs were redacted, not sure how a complete paragraph are all words that is personal data to someone else), I seen that I was being referred to by the Solicitors who work for DNLAW as “Troublesome”, and the reason for this was because I was “Wanting to do things by the book”.

I can only assume that DNLAW do not want to do things by the book!

BTW, this was at a time I was their client and paying for their time and advice, and therefore I was a paying customer. Very strange way to talk about someone they are charging £350 per hour +VAT

I raised a complaint about how I had been referred to like this and it was investigated by Mr Stephen Tame, who responded but refused to give any substantive responses and completely disagreed with my complaint which means that Dale & Newbury are perfectly happy to refer to their clients that are paying them to represent them in very impolite and unprofessional way.

There was no apology at all.

So, if you are happy with paying £350 per hour +VAT and have the people you are paying refer to you like this, then DNLAW are going to make you happy.

If however, you would like the firm you instruct to at least be polite and not refer to you in a derogatory way, then avoid at all cost.

All the above is true and accurate and I have the documents to prove it.

2025幎4月25日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Extremely Unprofessional - Avoid at All Costs!

Extremely Unprofessional - Avoid at All Costs!

I recently made a formal complaint to them about one of their Solicitors who was acting for me, but the firm completely ignored their own procedures for handling complaints.

According to their own guidelines, a different person should have investigated my complaint, yet instead, I received an email from the solicitor I was complaining about, informing me that he would be looking into it. This is both unprofessional and highly inappropriate.

Additionally, I submitted a Subject Access Request (SAR) under GDPR 2018, and despite following this up 16 days later after no acknowledgement had been sent to me, I still haven't received any acknowledgment or response.

It’s clear that the only way forward now is to escalate the matter to the SRA, Legal Ombudsman, and ICO.

It seems they believe that being solicitors gives them free rein to disregard rules and regulations, but this lack of accountability is unacceptable.

2024幎12月17日
自発的なレビュヌ

レビュヌの察象になっおいる䌁業の方ぞ

プロフィヌルを登録しお、Trustpilot の無料ビゞネス ツヌルにアクセスし、お客様ずの぀ながりを広げおください。

無料アカりントを取埗

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報