DO NOT ATTEND HERE. THEIR INEXPERIENCE COULD'VE KILLED MY DAUGHTER.
If I could rate FairWays with a 0, that would still be too kind. My experience with FairWays starts back in August 2024. Me and my partner (who I will refer to as G) were going through court proceedings with our severely disabled daughter (who I will refer to as L) back in Nov 2023 after being victims to a series of severe false allegations. These were around neglect and even abuse between parent-child, and parent-parent so once our social worker came with a section 20, naturally we both refused to sign it and went on a section 47. After court occurred three days later, we originally got told that a placement at FairWays was available for 5th Jan 2024.
Ready to move in, we had our bags packed all set to move in, however on the 4th Jan we got told that the move wasn't going to happen. Originally the excuse was based around FairWays requiring attention least 13 staff members to be trained up on Nasogastric tube feeding, as well as Epilepsy safety and warning signs. This was not the case. The true reason why we were denied was because FairWays didn't confirm the move-in details with our social worker, until June later on that year.
Fast forward to August, we moved in on the 16th and for the first six weeks the assessment was going fantastic. Every staff member we had assigned to us were trained in NG feeds, and epilepsy safety. Every care plan regarding physiotherapy and basic care was followed by myself, G and staff to the most highest standards until after our midway report came into hand. All of a sudden the script got flipped when L was assigned to nursery full time, and they then started to demand that we did more physio than was recommended for L, we weren't feeding L properly and safely, the relationship between myself and G wasn't sturdy and secure enough for L and this continued for three weeks.
L then started to have seizures inside of FairWays, and when me and my partner heard the scream come from L we instantly phoned up staff who had denied letting us see CCTV footage due to the issue not being a safeguarding matter. I had to physically raise my voice to the supervisor Camilla who was on shift that day, and repeat that if she has had a seizure and we didn't take her to hospital then that wouldn't be negligence on our behalf, it would be on their behalf. So she went to get the CCTV footage, and once we saw the footage Camilla decided to try and reassure her that L didn't have a seizure because she didn't convulse when the epilepsy training they "completed" wouldn't be on full body convulsions, it would've been on tenure seizures that L is subject to. Once I had recognized the seizure Camilla then continued to ask me what the next step in this process should be, further proving her lack of training by stating that I shouldn't have picked up my daughter if she was having a seizure (I checked for responsiveness during that period stated, and once I got a response from L to show cognitive consciousness I then deemed it safe to pick her up, comfort her or even place her in the recovery position if necessary). This could've put L at severe harm if neither myself or G were in the flat at the time due to staff allowing both parents to leave their children on CCTV to either go to the toilet, outside for a vape/smoke or to the shops.
This wasn't the only time staff failed to safeguard our daughter. Luna's paternal grandparents (who I will refer to as P and K) we're visiting us on the 2nd Nov 2024. L had a seizure in P's arms, and once I had contacted staff sure enough Camilla came to the flat and tried to deny our right to call 111 because staff should've been in the flat to supervise the visit, when there were none inside the flat. P then also raised his voice at Camilla, and sure enough she started to raise her voice back, I requested a different staff member to come inside of our flat and assist with defusing the situation, which was denied by Camilla so I decided to take matters into my own hands and contacted the Manager of FairWays. Long story short, 111 came to see L and decided it was necessary to take L to hospital, therefore continuing further scrutinization by staff members.
The next item on their agenda regarded physio after L had a seizure. On L's care plan, it clearly states no physio should be conducted until 24 hours after the most recent seizure, but what did FairWays demand we did? Put L in her standing frame 3 hours after a seizure. Not only did this go against her care plan, but this could've caused yet another seizure to occur possibly leading to further permanent damage in the apparatus, and surely enough later on that evening L had another seizure.
This lack of training is disgraceful, and when Ofsted were contacted shortly after new staff members were introduced into the property through Indeed. I will continue this review in a different one because I have ran out of space.