Guest365 レビュヌ 

4
•
TrustScore 5段階評䟡の4

3.8

レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら


連絡先

3.8

ほが満足

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の4

4件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

最近のレビュヌ䟝頌の蚘録はありたせん

この䌁業は最近、顧客にレビュヌを䟝頌しおいないため、レビュヌが党䜓の意芋を反映しおいない可胜性がありたす。

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

3.8

すべおのレビュヌ

(4)

過去12か月のレビュヌ数: 3ä»¶

レビュヌを曞く

レビュヌの確認を行いたす

Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち5の評䟡

Great experience

I stayed at one of their properties for 2 weeks in Manchester and the customer service was excellent, lovely clean room, easy check in process and overall a great experience. Recently decided to book with them again as they are reliable and guaranteed a great experience.

2025幎10月7日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Poor administration, weak security systems and a cavalier attitude.

A recent accommodation booking in Liverpool was my first Guest365 experience as far as I know. I hope it will be my last. The company acts as the managing agent for serviced accommodation on behalf of the owners of individual properties. Pre-stay correspondence gives the misleading impression of direct contact with the owners.

Things I didn't like:
1) Over intrusive identity verification including copy of passport, raising security concerns which were later magnified by numerous spam messages, supposedly from the property, fraudulently seeking payment card details. I reported this immediately but the messages continued. I understand that this usually arises from weak security on the accommodation provider’s side, not from a hack of Booking.com’s central system or infrastructure.
2) Time wasting demand for late confirmation of arrival time. Having lengthily navigated the web site to get to the relevant part, there was no option to confirm an arrival time, only an option to change it.
3) Non-arrival of the confirmatory email which should have included a code to enable key collection.
4) At the collection point the key could be released by the shop-keeper only with the code. Confirmation of the booking was not enough. I called the phone number listed for the property. It was not until then that I realised I was dealing with an agency. At first the operator could find no trace of my booking. It took nearly 20 minutes before resolution, despite the Booking.com confirmation details.
5) The address was listed incorrectly on the Booking.com site (it still is). It took another lengthy phone call to the Guest365 operator to locate the apartment.
6) The apartment was pervaded by awful smells. A grill-pan in the oven had not been washed and contained rancid fat. The bathroom smelled of drains. There was a cobweb on the ceiling and crumbs in the kitchen drawer mechanism.

We walked out and booked alternative Booking.com accommodation nearby. Time was short and we had already wasted an hour collecting the key and finding the property. This was a mini-break in celebration of our Golden Wedding Anniversary (we were married nearby in 1975). The smell was the deal-breaker. A quick clean and an air-freshener spray would not have provided a quick cure. The apartment needed a lengthier period of ventilation too.

Problems can occur in any business and ill-will is usually easily avoided by judicious use of an apology and appropriate redress, when a complaint is justified. But instead of doing the right thing and acknowledging the failure, Guest365 have simply dug their heels in and refused a refund.

I use property agents to let several of my own properties. But if any of them showed such evidence of poor administration, weak security systems and a similarly cavalier attitude to the users of the accommodation, they would not be my agents for much longer.

2025幎6月28日
自発的なレビュヌ

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報