レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら

2.8

たあたあ

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の3

3件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

レビュヌ䟝頌の蚘録がありたせん

この䌁業は顧客にレビュヌを䟝頌しおいないため、レビュヌが党䜓の意芋を反映しおいない可胜性がありたす。

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

2.8

すべおのレビュヌ

(3)

過去12か月のレビュヌ数: 3ä»¶

レビュヌを曞く

レビュヌの確認を行いたす

Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

I would not recommend purchasing from


I would not recommend purchasing from Ventura Living based on my experience.

The king bed base I received was disappointing from the start. The assembly was far more difficult than it should have been because almost every screw hole was misaligned. We had to repeatedly adjust and force the angles just to get the screws in. I’ve assembled plenty of flat-pack furniture over the years, and this was by far the most frustrating.

The bed base also had a strong chemical smell that gave me a headache, even after it was assembled.

What concerned me most was discovering that the product still had the original manufacturer’s sticker attached. After searching for the same item online, I found it being sold elsewhere for around $170–$200, whereas I paid approximately $440 through Ventura Living. Paying more than double for what appears to be a very low-quality product was extremely disappointing.

I also submitted a review on their website describing my experience. When I checked back several days later, my review was not visible. I can’t say why it wasn’t published, but it left me questioning whether negative reviews are being displayed, which makes me less confident in the reliability of the reviews shown on their website.

Overall, poor product quality, difficult assembly, an unpleasant chemical smell, and concerns about review transparency made this a very disappointing purchase.

2026幎7月8日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Sham site

Sham site. We ordered a 'Martin Natural Timber Bed Frame' and what was sent out was different and substandard - even name of the product on the box and instructions was clearly labelled 'Alfordson Bed Frame' (different to what we purchased). Order #3981
The product sent had 8 significant differences (the colour, differences in construction, substandard materials, structural support).
CUSTOMER SERVICE IS WOEFUL, with back and forth emails asking the same questions and requesting the same photos over again (which we sent them more than they needed) yet no confirmation we would get a refund despite Ventura Living breaching Australian consumer law for misleading advertising on a product.
DO NOT BUY FROM THIS SHAM COMPANY!
Under Schedule 2 of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010, specifically the Australian Consumer Law (ACL):
- Section 56 guarantees that goods must match their description.
- Section 54 guarantees that goods must be of acceptable quality. Because the product delivered completely departs from the description and fails acceptable quality standards, this constitutes a 'Major Failure' under Section 260 of the ACL.

2026幎6月26日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

BAIT & SWITCH - DO NOT buy from this company!!

I paid $450 plus postage for what looked like a beautiful bed frame from an "Australian" company. What arrived was a product that's available on Amazon for around $200 with the original Chinese manufacturer's branding still on it.
The quality was atrocious and unsafe. Unfinished timber covered in long sharp splinters, multiple planks visibly warped.

I immediately contacted them to return it but they kept giving me the run around, asked me to individually label and photograph every defective part, and tried to excuse the Chinese branding as "differences in manufacturing". How is that acceptable??

When I tried to warn other buyers on IG and Facebook the company blocked me and deleted my comments.

It took many emails back and forth with their customer service, who consistently stalled and ignored or pretended to not read my specific concerns and just responded with canned responses/AI generated script until they finally agreed to accept an exchange. Even then, they again asked for photos of the box "so we can generate the return label" even though I'd literally sent them those photos the day before.

EDIT: On top of all that, apparently they've also signed me up to SMS marketing I didn't consent to.

Do not buy from this company!

2026幎5月7日
自発的なレビュヌ

レビュヌの察象になっおいる䌁業の方ぞ

プロフィヌルを登録しお、Trustpilot の無料ビゞネス ツヌルにアクセスし、お客様ずの぀ながりを広げおください。

無料アカりントを取埗

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報