レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら

䌁業情報


連絡先

2.5

期埅以䞋

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の2.5

5件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

レビュヌ䟝頌の蚘録がありたせん

この䌁業は顧客にレビュヌを䟝頌しおいないため、レビュヌが党䜓の意芋を反映しおいない可胜性がありたす。

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

2.5

すべおのレビュヌ

(5)

過去12か月のレビュヌ数: 5ä»¶

レビュヌを曞く

レビュヌの確認を行いたす

Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

I do not believe an Atkins style diet

I do not believe an Atkins style diet, very low carbohydrate approach is appropriate for me, and I am concerned that this is essentially the dietary approach Virta is promoting.

More importantly, I have repeatedly explained to the Virta team that I have spent a lifetime trying this type of diet and that it has not been effective or sustainable for me. I do not feel that this concern has been adequately heard or incorporated into my care.

I already work with my own dietitian, and I am making measurable progress with some small, individualized modifications that are realistic and sustainable for me long term. I am not opposed to dietary intervention, but I am opposed to being required to follow an approach that I know from extensive personal experience is not appropriate for me.

Virta is a barrier to care because I cannot access GLP 1 therapy without participating in the program due to my husband’s employer requiring it. Even though I medically qualify for GLP medications, I cannot get them without participating in this program.

I am ok with having a dietitian, but I shouldn’t be required to follow Virta’s method because it is NOT appropriate for everyone! Hopefully my husband’s employer will reconsider making Virta a mandatory requirement for employees and their families who medically qualify for GLP 1 therapy.

As a healthcare professional, I strongly believe that individualized care should remain at the center of treatment decisions. If an employee already has an established relationship with a qualified dietitian that is working along side their PCP and is demonstrating progress with a sustainable plan, that should be recognized rather than requiring participation in a program that is not clinically appropriate for that individual. Virta is truly a barrier to care!

2026幎10月5日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Am liebsten keinen Stern

Am liebsten keinen Stern. Ware wurde frÃŒhzeitig von mir storniert. Trotzdem geliefert. ZurÃŒck gesendet an angegebene Anschrift auf Lieferung
Angeblich falsche Anschrift. Es wurde gleichzeitig ein Abo gebucht ohne Hinweis darauf. Fa. verweigert RÃŒckzahlung. Finger weg !!!

2026幎10月1日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Not looking out for your health

Not looking out for your health, only the bottom line. This company does nothing but try to save your employer money by making is so hard to obtain medication that you finally stop taking it due to the headache of trying to jump through their hoops to get a prescription renewal.

2026幎8月26日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

I cannot recommend Virta Health

I cannot recommend Virta Health, and I sincerely hope my employer chooses a different program during the next benefits enrollment.

My employer (for State of Alaska employees) switched all GLP-1 medication management to Virta, which meant we could no longer work with our own primary care providers for weight management. Instead, we were forced into Virta's virtual-only program.

The biggest issue is that there is no individualized care. Every patient seems to be treated exactly the same, regardless of their medical history or what their own physician has already established. Rather than listening to patients, the providers appear to follow a rigid script with little room for clinical judgment.

The provider assigned to me has been dismissive and, at times, outright rude. During one conversation, I was even accused of previously obtaining my medication from a medical spa, which was completely false. Patients also cannot choose or change providers, leaving you stuck if the relationship isn't working.

Communication is another major problem. Virta intentionally or negligently creates long delays. Even if you respond to a message immediately, they often wait 24 hours or more before replying. Since they only operate Monday through Friday, messages sent on Friday frequently aren't answered until Monday. These delays repeatedly postponed my prescription.

What made it even more frustrating was that every time I completed one requirement, another new requirement suddenly appeared days later. Instead of telling me everything that was needed upfront, the process became an endless cycle of waiting, completing another task, waiting again, and then being told there was yet another hurdle.

Before switching to Virta, I had been successfully working with my primary care provider and had already transitioned to taking my medication less frequently as part of a gradual maintenance plan. Virta ignored my established treatment plan and insisted that everyone must inject once per week because that's their protocol.

Ironically, because Virta's own delays kept me from receiving my prescription, they then claimed it had been "too long" since my last dose and reduced my medication strength. I repeatedly explained that I had already been taking the medication less frequently under my doctor's guidance and would not experience issues because of the longer interval. They completely disregarded my explanation.

They also insisted they needed a prior authorization from my insurance, despite the fact that I already had an approved authorization. All of our conversations occur in their messaging system, so this information was already available to them if they had reviewed my records. Instead, this caused yet another unnecessary delay.

After spending a month on the unnecessarily reduced dose, they simply increased me back to my original dose—essentially undoing what they had caused in the first place.

Most recently, after only two months on medication through Virta (and about four months in their program), they informed me they plan to discontinue my medication because I lost approximately five pounds. My weight naturally fluctuates by about five pounds, and my BMI is only barely within the high end of the normal range. I also have a long, documented history of obesity, yet none of that appears to have been considered before making such a significant treatment decision.

My husband's experience has been equally frustrating. He was told Virta would release him back to his primary care provider because his work schedule wasn't compatible with Virta's required logging. His PCP prescribed his medication, but when he attempted to renew his insurance authorization, it was denied because the insurance company was told he was still required to use Virta. When he contacted Virta, they admitted they had never officially released him from the program. As a result, for nearly three months, Virta wouldn't treat him, but they also prevented anyone else from treating him. It took months to resolve.

When my husband spoke with his employer's benefits representative, he was told that the transition to Virta has been a nightmare for many employees. Based on our experience, I believe it.

If your employer requires you to use Virta, document your experiences and report problems to your benefits department. Employers need to know how these programs are affecting the employees who rely on them.

And if you're a benefits administrator considering Virta for your employees, I strongly encourage you to look elsewhere. Weight management requires individualized medical care, responsive communication, and providers who listen to their patients. Unfortunately, our experience with Virta has been the exact opposite.

2026幎6月30日
自発的なレビュヌ

レビュヌの察象になっおいる䌁業の方ぞ

プロフィヌルを登録しお、Trustpilot の無料ビゞネス ツヌルにアクセスし、お客様ずの぀ながりを広げおください。

無料アカりントを取埗

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報