レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら

䌁業情報

  1. 教育機関
  2. 教育センタヌ
  3. 航空孊校

さたざたな倖郚゜ヌスから提䟛された情報

A new kind of pilot training academy. It's time to aim higher. Talk to us about Modular and Integrated commercial training, degree options also available.


連絡先

2.3

期埅以䞋

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の2.5

7件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Stay Way Clear

I joined Leading Edge Aviation as a modular student to complete my MEP, CPL, AUPRT, MEIR and APS MCC after L3 stopped accepting modular trainees. I was told the course would take around 6 months, and that modular students were not eligible for accommodation, so I had to arrange and fund my own. In reality, the training took 15 months due to extensive delays, increasing my living costs by over £10,000 beyond what had been budgeted. To add to the inconsistency, the other modular student in my intake was provided accommodation.

During my induction in early August, I was told I would not be placed on the schedule until September, meaning I had pointlessly paid a full month of rent and bills before starting training. When I did start, my first 5 flights were with contractors, and when I introduced myself to my assigned instructor, he was unaware I had even been allocated to him.

Throughout the course, scheduling was the single biggest issue. Instructors appeared to have significantly more students than they could manage, and flying frequency was often around once per week if fortunate. The limited multi-engine fleet was frequently unavailable due to maintenance, with multiple cancellations due to basic technical issues where engineering delays meant the lesson slot was missed.

Raising concerns was extremely difficult. Discussions had to go through instructors who had little control over scheduling, and engagement from management was minimal, with concerns regularly dismissed. In practice, dialogue only seemed to occur when the possibility of withholding instalments due to a lack of progress was raised.

Operational policies also added unnecessary complexity, as approaches/ circuits could only be requested the day before, often leaving very limited availability. A particularly negative experience occurred with the operations manager, Mike Craig. After unsuccessfully trying to secure approach slots at five airports the previous day, I was advised by another operations assistant that ops would call again in the morning. When I approached him to request an ILS at Oxford as instructed, he became aggressive and began shouting, despite me simply following prior guidance.

The training timeline between students was also notable, as despite widespread delays, students on the Leading Edge funded instructor pathway progressed far more rapidly, with integrated courses completed within 18 months and at least one student competing their MEIR in a week, which took me 6 months.

There are also crippling administrative issues as 5 months after leaving the school I am still waiting for my end-of-training report required for airline applications despite repeated assurances. Modular students are also excluded from graduate services unless paying a substantial additional fee, preventing access to airline tagging schemes despite already self-funding accommodation.

Excluding this my primary instructor delivered a high standard of instruction, and some instructors were clearly doing their best within a constrained system. However, communication was non-existent, and instructional quality varied significantly.

The APS MCC course is strong, however the simulator had frequent technical issues and for the entire course we had no usable left-side projection and during one session only the centre projector was functioning.

Finally, as a modular student who completed ground school elsewhere, the lack of accommodation and infrequent flying made it difficult to build friendships or integrate with other students, adding to what was already a prolonged and stressful experience.

Overall, I felt Leading Edge has enrolled more students than its operational capacity can effectively support. Which has resulted in extreme delays, increased costs, and significant frustration. While there are capable instructors and some strong course elements, my modular experience left a lot to be desired.

2025幎10月2日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Terrible.

Terrible unorganised flight school in debt. Marketing is great, however misleading information. Oxford and Alhama Campus is terrible. No one communicates aggressive instructors and directors. Highly not recommended. Unprofessional.

2025幎11月12日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Truely awful company

Truely awful company, they owe our son over 35k after miselling thier training contract. We have been chasing the refund since September, looks like we'll end up in court. Do not part with you money, do not use this flight school.

2026幎1月26日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

All fur coat - run a credit report before parting with any money

All fur coat - I'd run a credit report before handing any money over to this company. They are currently proposing 19 students vacate accommodation part way through ATPLs course as they have ran out of accommodation. Remote learning although Face-to- face has been paid for and accommodation pre-paid in full - disgraceful organisation.

2026幎1月14日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Big mistake avoid totally

Do not give your money to this shower is s##t
They want your money upfront which is the 1st mistake,
When you get to Spain your be fobbed off with 1 flight a week if your lucky, they laugh in your face with your concerns and mental wellbeing.
They don’t answer calls proper bunch of amateurs,
PLEASE don’t fall into the trap do not give them your Money.

2024幎12月12日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Don’t go to Leading Edge Aviation!!

They state it will take 18 months - add at least another 36 months onto that! Such a disorganised company that keep taking on students but don’t have the instructors to train them. Average one training flight every 3 weeks (if you are lucky!) and there’s no one to complain to about this. There is no system to how they share the flight training out fairly. I would 100% NOT recommend this flight school.

2025幎6月4日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Smoke and mirrors

On the face of it, the marketing and look of this place is great. I attended ground school and flight training here in early 2024.

Let's start with ground school. The instructors were knowledgeable and helpful, but are only there because they have medical issues or have been forced to retire as real pilots. When we came to be ready for our exams, we were told that we would have to wait TWO MONTHS before we could sit exams, and would have to start the next module anyway. When we challenged this and said we could get exam slots at other centres next week, we were told that we could not do this and if we did, we would be subject to a training review and they would give us a bad end of course report for our airlines. This is effective blackmail. This happened twice more when it came to our other exams, more delays as there aren't enough sittings available in their in-house exam room!

Then we got to flying - we were sent to Alhama in Spain, the fair weather base and I managed to fly 10 hours in 3 months due to the sheer amount of students they had there. Accommodation was nice but we never flew, we got bored and when we raised it with management, were told to "suck it up and enjoy the sun". Aircraft tech, too many students, too few flying slots. It took me a further 8 weeks to finish another 10 hours.

I wouldn't recommend LEAL to anybody for the reasons above.

2024幎2月1日
自発的なレビュヌ

レビュヌの察象になっおいる䌁業の方ぞ

プロフィヌルを登録しお、Trustpilot の無料ビゞネス ツヌルにアクセスし、お客様ずの぀ながりを広げおください。

無料アカりントを取埗

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

䌁業は、自動招埅を介しおレビュヌを䟝頌するこずができたす。この方法で埗られたレビュヌは、本物の経隓に基づいたものであり、確認枈みのラベルが付䞎されたす。

他の皮類のレビュヌに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報