Pru UK レビュー 

Absolute seamless service from start to finish .

Process directions followed to satisfactory conclusion.

Everything was easy on line and the transaction done within days

Very simple explanation and easily inderstood

Straight forward service, no problems encountered so everything was as expected.

Am happy to help but it would have been helpful if we knew from
the outset as to how many questions we would be expected to answer. If I had known how long the questionnaire would take to complete, I would not have taken part.

Excellent service. Agents on phone so helpful

Dealing with requests expeditiously

Over all requesting withdrawal of my funds was pleasant and was completed within a good time frame.

A straight forward process to access my pru pension plan with great helpful imfomation and the help of a F.A was the right way to go, thank you Pru.

EASY QUICK EFFICINT

The Pru is great all works well.
However this survey is way too long asking the same questions over and over.

I would strongly encourage consumers to exercise caution and ask detailed questions before placing trust-held investments with The Pru.
In my family’s case, a PruFund Investment Plan valued at approximately £105,000 was surrendered to a third party connected to the wider Philips Trust Corporation / Family Trust Corporation scandal. The surrender was processed using documentation which should not have been accepted for this product and included signatures that we believe were not properly authorised under the trust arrangements.
Of particular concern was that the form used contained wording stating that it should not be used for the type of investment plan it was ultimately used to surrender.
The Financial Ombudsman Service rejected our complaint, concluding that Pru acted in “good faith” (FOS investigators second reason for rejecting the complaint after the first technical reason for rejecting the complaint was challenged and proved incorrect). During the investigation the Pru did not provide documentation requested to demonstrate their regulatory required policies and procedures that should have protected client funds. However, we remain concerned that the wider regulatory and procedural issues were not properly examined in a fair and transparent manner by FOS.
This is not an isolated issue. Evidence presented to the FCA suggests that hundreds of trust-held investments across multiple regulated firms may have been surrendered under similar circumstances, involving tens of millions of pounds affecting elderly and vulnerable consumers, however, the FCA has stated “…complaints about the actions or decisions of the Ombudsman Service fall outside the scope of the FCA Complaints Scheme.”.
The matter has now been escalated to the Financial Regulators Complaints Commissioner for independent review.
Consumers with trust-held investments should ensure they fully understand the safeguards and verification procedures their provider applies before any surrender or transfer of funds is authorised.