レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら

レビュアヌのコメントを芋おみたしょう

5぀星のうち5の評䟡

From my experience in Two years NACCS is the great company I have ever seen. All the staff members are professional especially brother Anjum. He is very polite and if I have any issue with my property... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち5の評䟡

I have been dealing with NACCS for a few years now and their services have been excellent from day one. All members of staff are very helpful, provide excellent management and are very efficient. Str... もっず芋る

䌁業が回答したした

5぀星のうち5の評䟡

I have been dealing with NACCS for a number of years and have always found them to be honest, timely and very professional. Rents are always paid on time. Communication is great and made in advan... もっず芋る

䌁業が回答したした

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

NACCS are an immoral company This company is ethically bankrupt. It is profiting from Home Office contracts to make the lives of asylum seekers in the UK as miserable as possible. Cold food, shodd... もっず芋る

䌁業情報

  1. 䞍動産賃貞゚ヌゞェンシヌ
  2. アパヌト賃貞業
  3. 建蚭䌚瀟
  4. 䞍動産メンテナンス

圓該䌁業による蚘述

Guarantee your rent and property investment. We offer landlords peace of mind through secured rental income and specialist property management.


連絡先

4.5

優良

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の4.5

90件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

最近のレビュヌ䟝頌の蚘録はありたせん

この䌁業は最近、顧客にレビュヌを䟝頌しおいないため、レビュヌが党䜓の意芋を反映しおいない可胜性がありたす。

ネガティブなレビュヌに回答しおいたせん

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

4.5

すべおのレビュヌ

(90)

過去12か月のレビュヌ数: 12ä»¶

レビュヌを曞く
Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

NACCS is making profits from the misery


NACCS is making profits from the misery of people who have already suffered trauma. How can overcrowding and non existent Covid risk assessments be going unchallenged during a global pandemic. And that’s just the tip of the iceberg regarding the multiple issues people are being forced to deal with every day. Inhumane treatment of vulnerable people.

2021幎2月15日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Close the barracks.

This company is ethically bankrupt. It is profiting from Home Office contracts to make the lives of asylum seekers in the UK as miserable as possible. Cold food, shoddy heating, inadequate healthcare, barbed wire fences, security guards. The world is watching Napier Barracks and we’re watching you too NACCS!

2021幎2月15日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Shame on NACCS

NACCS are the subcontractors of inhumane camps for asylum seekers in which the conditions are unliveable. At one camp - Napier Barracks in Kent - there are upwards of 14 people to a single room, there have been confirmed cases of Covid amongst residents but people cannot leave, have no ability to distance and a lack of basic facilities for hygiene. Disgraceful.

2021幎2月15日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Profiting off government contracts


Profiting off government contracts while providing completely substandard housing for migrants during a pandemic. Shameful. Solidarity with all those housed in Napier Barracks and other inhumane accommodation, and those who are doing what they can to help. This should not be your first experience, or any experience of this country.

2021幎2月15日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Terrible experience of accommodation managed by NACCS

For 3 weeks I was housed in accommodation that I later found out was managed by NACCS, at the time I had no idea. It was terrible and barely fit for human habitation, I was able to leave but I feel so sorry for those still stuck places like the one I experienced. For long periods of time there was no hot running water and the electricity would frequently go off. There were no hand washing facilities in many of the toilets and for long periods of time, I was forced to go without a shower. I find it hard to believe that a company as big and wealthy as this, while receiving government contracts, would be allowed to provide such substandard accommodation. Disgusting.

2021幎2月15日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

NACCS is detaining asylum seekers

NACCS is detaining asylum seekers in unsafe conditions at their Napier Barracks, during a pandemic. They are complicit in the Home Office’s fascistic border policies. How any human who works at NACCS can look at the situation and feel that it’s an acceptable way to treat fellow human beings is utterly beyond me. Shame on every person who continues to directly and indirectly support this inhumanity

2021幎2月15日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Billy Plough from Brundish

Abhorrent company, I've never, ever, in my long life come across such an abhorrent company as Nationwide Accommodation Service.
Housing those desperate souls in such shocking accommodation, they should be ashamed. They can deny it all they want, but its clear as day, they profit from the destitution of some extremely vulnerable people! Who have come in hope of refuge and shelter.

Not in my name, not on my nelly!

Billy (not a happy chappy) Plough

2021幎2月15日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

NACCS manages inhumane camps for asylum seekers

NACCS should be ashamed of themselves. They are managing inhumane "camps" for asylum seekers in which the conditions are unliveable. At one camp - Napier Barracks in Kent - there are upwards of 14 people to a single room, and there have been confirmed cases of Covid amongst residents, but people cannot leave, have no ability to distance, and a lack of basic facilities for hygiene. Disgraceful.

2021幎2月15日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Ethically bankrupt

This company is ethically bankrupt. It is profiting from Home Office contracts to make the lives of asylum seekers in the UK as miserable as possible. Cold food, shoddy heating, inadequate healthcare, barbed wire fences, security guards. The world is watching Napier Barracks and we’re watching you too NACCS!

2021幎2月15日
自発的なレビュヌ

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

䌁業は、自動招埅を介しおレビュヌを䟝頌するこずができたす。この方法で埗られたレビュヌは、本物の経隓に基づいたものであり、確認枈みのラベルが付䞎されたす。

他の皮類のレビュヌに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報