TMS Legal レビュヌ 

605
•
TrustScore 5段階評䟡の4.5

4.5

レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら

レビュアヌのコメントを芋おみたしょう

5぀星のうち5の評䟡

TMS Legal won my case with my bank in what was an easy process from my point of view. They asked some questions and then took care of all the legalities concerning my claim. In a short period of time... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち5の評䟡

Totally bowled over, TMS Legal are the team who can! Their hardwork, determination and professionalism got big results and I couldn't have done it without their expertise. Even when I received letter... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち5の評䟡

Was unsure if I had a case for being given multiple increases on a credit card limit, that I simply couldn't afford, but accepted as it was being offered to me by the lender. TMS took on the claim... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Promised me they would help with a Lloyds overdraft. I now have a default on my credit score, been refused a mortgage application. Lloyds have given them thousands of pounds of my compensation. They... もっず芋る

䌁業情報

  1. 法埋事務所

圓該䌁業による蚘述

Solicitors specialising in mis-sold financial products - unafordable lending on loans, credit cards, overdrafts and vehicle finance. Also packgaged bank account claims.


連絡先

4.5

優良

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の4.5

605件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

最近のレビュヌ䟝頌の蚘録はありたせん

この䌁業は最近、顧客にレビュヌを䟝頌しおいないため、レビュヌが党䜓の意芋を反映しおいない可胜性がありたす。

ネガティブなレビュヌの 45に回答しおいたす

通垞1カ月以内に回答

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

4.5

すべおのレビュヌ

(605)

過去12か月のレビュヌ数: 54ä»¶

レビュヌを曞く
Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

This is the worse of the worse

This is the worse of the worse. They acted on credit card charges. After 4 yers I hade first letter they win case winning £540 which i never received.
They send me bill £1260. And if i don't pay they will charge me each month £50 on top. When I called and explain as disabled on disability and cancer patient i can only pay £5.00 month they refused and say I have to pay £20.00,a month. If don't pay they use enforcement.
Very very harsh !! I won't be eating or keeping warm . Avoid this company its big scam. !!! Scam scam

2026幎4月2日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

What a complete rip off this company


What a complete rip off this company are they have just ripped me off with Therefore, the commission due to us is £537.33- £504.37(amount we will receive) = £32.96. and they want me to pay them another £32.96 what a bunch of crooks charging £537.33 commission what a joke at least Richard Turpin wore a mask robbing people

2026幎3月2日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Very Poor Progress and Communication

They were assigned for two cases.

One has been ongoing since July 2025 without success.

Another has been incorrectly rejected based on allegedly being time barred, however I have highlighted that there are two methods of time barred calculations in law where one such basis applies in my case.

I have requested substantive updates and specific responses to my particular cases and the circumstances applicable to the cases, which I am fully entitled to.

My specific requests are not being replied to or acted upon.

My experience of the service is that I am not being sufficiently represented in accordance with instructions.

2026幎2月14日
自発的なレビュヌ
TMS Legal ロゎ

TMS Legal からの回答

We’re sorry to read that you feel dissatisfied with our service.

Due to confidentiality and regulatory obligations, we cannot discuss the specifics of any client matter in a public forum. However, we can clarify our general approach.

Where a complaint is rejected by a lender on time-limit grounds, we assess the applicable regulatory framework carefully before deciding whether a referral to the Financial Ombudsman Service is reasonable and proportionate. Clients always retain the right to refer matters to the Ombudsman themselves if they disagree with that assessment.

In relation to ongoing cases, unfortunately many lenders are currently exceeding regulatory response timeframes due to significant industry backlogs. We continue to pursue outstanding matters and update clients when substantive progress occurs.

We aim to communicate clearly and act in our clients’ best interests at all times. If any client feels that our service has fallen below expectations, we operate a formal complaints procedure which allows concerns to be reviewed independently.

We have contacted the reviewer directly to address their concerns through the appropriate channels.

— TMS Legal Ltd

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Lack of Accountability, Appalling Conduct, and Refusal to Pay Court-Ordered Judgment

2nd Update:

TMS Legal Ltd tried to dispute this review with Trustpilot, but TrustPilot Support confirmed it is not defamatory and reinstated it! Yet again, the firm chooses to manipulate situations instead of earning respect by taking accountability for their actions.

You'll notice today 11 February 2026, TMS Legal Ltd suddenly responded to multiple Trustpilot reviews dating back to September 2025. Seemingly triggered by my honest review, this highlights their reactive, and defensive approach to controlling the narrative of public honest feedback.

In this case, I wasn't asking them to comment,it was simply a review of my experience with them.

--------------

Update:

TMS Legal Ltd’s response below highlights the very issue behind my complaint. They were given sufficient opportunity to review my complaint, Letter of Claim, and court submission, yet failed to act within the required timescales. A default judgment was issued as a result.

For clarity, my request to revoke their authority to act on my behalf did not authorise the closure of my complaint with Lloyds Bank. This is nonetheless the instruction TMS Legal Ltd issued to the bank.

I hold written evidence, including documentation provided during their internal complaints process and the email sent to Lloyds Bank confirming they directed the complaint to be closed, which is considered incorrect and negligent.

Only after the legal process progressed did they submit a set-aside application outside the original response window. This does not change the fact that they failed to engage when required, despite multiple attempts by me to contact them, and the judgment remains unpaid.

While TMS Legal Ltd continues to rely on legal process language in its response, Trustpilot is a platform for customers to share their experiences.

As my review has not been formally disputed or challenged with a request for removal, I can only assume the information provided here is accepted as accurate and reflective of my experience.

--------------

My Review:

I filed a Small Claims Court claim against TMS Legal Ltd for negligent instructions and failure to provide agreed services. The court issued a default judgment in my favour, yet they have refused to pay.

Despite being fully aware that I intended to escalate to court, TMS Legal Ltd ignored all communication and attempted to use legal loopholes to overturn the judgment. One of their managing directors repeatedly sent the same emails, misrepresenting the firm’s actions and showing a clear lack of accountability and understanding of legal processes.

I have now escalated the case to the Legal Ombudsman and the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA). Their conduct mirrors many other negative reviews: poor legal knowledge, inaction, and repeated mismanagement.

Too proud to admit error, this so-called reputable law firm lets enforcement continue to reclaim what's owed. I'm embarrassed for them!

I encourage others to stand up for what’s right.

TMS Legal claims to be ‘Your Advocate for Financial Justice.’

Yet clearly, that principle doesn’t apply to them.

2026幎2月11日
自発的なレビュヌ
TMS Legal ロゎ

TMS Legal からの回答

TMS Legal Ltd does not comment publicly on individual matters that are subject to ongoing court proceedings or regulatory review.

The issues referred to in this review are currently before the Court and are therefore disputed. A set-aside application has been filed and the matter will be determined through the appropriate legal process.

We are committed to acting professionally and in accordance with our regulatory obligations. Where concerns are raised, they are addressed through the proper legal and regulatory channels.

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Incompetent, dont bother

Waited 7 months for a decision to be told because I closed the overdraft more than 6 years ago the claim would be dropped. Surely this is one of the first things you check?

2026幎1月28日
自発的なレビュヌ
TMS Legal ロゎ

TMS Legal からの回答

Hello Sam we are sorry to hear you are not happy with your outcome. There are many occasions when timebar can be overcome, which is why we sometimes opt to submit this type of claim.

5぀星のうち5の評䟡

Brilliant service

From start to finish was kept informed of what was going on. Used this company a few times and everytime got a fab result. Staff are very polite and helpful. Thankyou for my little windfall that I never expected

2026幎1月19日
自発的なレビュヌ

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報