レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら

レビュアヌのコメントを芋おみたしょう

5぀星のうち3の評䟡

I'm a Scrivener fan but wanted to try the ProWritingAid add-on to Scrivener. It's pretty bad tbh. The rephrasing options are terrible; they are based only on the sentence, missing context and voice co... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち5の評䟡

The company seems to understand writers better than almost any other. The people who helped design this tool seem to really care for the working writer. And even hobbyists that only write fo... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち4の評䟡

It helps a lot but half feedback is behind a pay wall and also it can be a little inaccurate at times. However, it has helped me a lot with my writing, and also has scheduled times so I can be consist... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち5の評䟡

I'm a storywriter and I use ProWritingAid to edit. I think it comes in handy (I use the free function). The only thing that bothers me is that the experience is not the same as the paid version and t... もっず芋る

䌁業情報

  1. ゜フトりェア䌁業

圓該䌁業による蚘述

Your personal writing coach. A grammar checker, style editor, and writing mentor in one package. The best writing depends on much more than just correct grammar. You need an editing tool that also highlights style issues and compares your writing to th...


連絡先

4.3

優良

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の4.5

673件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

最近のレビュヌ䟝頌の蚘録はありたせん

この䌁業は最近、顧客にレビュヌを䟝頌しおいないため、レビュヌが党䜓の意芋を反映しおいない可胜性がありたす。

ネガティブなレビュヌの 12に回答しおいたす

通垞1週間以内に回答

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

4.3

すべおのレビュヌ

(673)

過去12か月のレビュヌ数: 473ä»¶

レビュヌを曞く
Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち4の評䟡

Overall Good, Room for Improvements

Overall, very helpful.
I do have one issue when it comes to rephrasing options. I find that it attempts to remove the writer's voice even when set to creative mode. As a fantasy writer, voice is incredibly important to my work, and it is a struggle to see it flagged as 'incorrect' when it is more of a subjective opinion than linguistically correct. I do enjoy the sidebar feature on Google Docs as well.

2026幎3月26日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち4の評䟡

Great for Creative Manuscripts

I love ProWritingAid because of its friendly interface, ease of use and more relaxed rephrasing. I ran a manuscript critique and it genuinely blew me away with how it described the complex dynamics and themes present in my story's setting and characters, and now I've gotten the push I need to not rewrite the end of my story, but give it some sense and spine.

My only qualm with it is how expensive credits are, and how it doesn't consider character dialect when flagging errors in dialogue.

2026幎3月24日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち5の評䟡

I'm currently writing a story of my own


I'm currently writing a story of my own right now, and ProWritingAid is helping bring out the detailed and sophisticated language that I'm looking for. No matter what I am writing, whether it be a letter, a document, or just continuing with my story, ProWritingAid is there to help me with my writing and to make it as effective as possible!

2026幎3月23日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち4の評䟡

Ease of use

Ease of use. And helpful suggestion.

But often I'll receive conflicting corrections. i.e. A pop-up will tell me to remove a comma. I'll remove the comma, then another pop-up will tell me to add a comma.

2026幎3月22日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち4の評䟡

It is very good at picking up errors


It is very good at picking up errors and providing constructive criticism on reports and texts. Its customisation options ensure whatever your writing is perfect for the task at hand. However, the limit on report runs is very short, especially if writing a gradable report. I will note that payment plans a reasonable and the lifetime plan is a standout that no other type of grammar tool has, which makes it a clear favourite personally.

2026幎3月22日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち5の評䟡

Love it!

I like it so much that it corrects my writing; I learn while practicing. Receiving reports and critiques is also beneficial for my improvement and helps my self-esteem.

2026幎3月20日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

awful experience.

awful experience.
paid 43 dollars for a month subscription. app dors not give you many suggestions other than grammer and some basic phrases, and then when requesting a refund just after an hour of use, they did not accept. told me they only refund for yearly subscriptions!
this is really weird.

2026幎3月17日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち3の評䟡

Review

The colour coordination helps tell things. The problem is that you don't know whether something is premium blocked or not until you hover over it, because there isn't a single colour for the premium ones. The style guide is very annoying as doing something as simple as calling something good or bad gets it flagged. While there is an option to disable it, I'm wary that something else useful will too.

2026幎3月16日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち3の評䟡

Great! But there is slight issues...

ProWritingAid is honestly really helpful, better than most popular writing assistance, but its lacks features that can be used without pro. Its difficult to be a professional writer, while having the money to pay for a subscription as such. There are many uses and tools in ProWritingAid that is not available for me, so without taking money, I wish the company had advertisements to pay for their funding, allowing loyal users of the extension to freely and creatively use their writing talents, without worry of a paid subscription. Overall, a nice touch but needs some evaluating.

2026幎3月16日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち2の評䟡

Just hire a human editor

While sometimes useful on a technical level for things like grammar or pointing out when you're using passive voice or too many glue words, it's not worth paying for. The chapter critique is inconsistent if you go back to ask for multiple critiques on the same chapter - literally the things it said were good ony first critique it said were concerns the next critique. It also has a lot of trouble understanding what tense you're using. It kept suggesting corrections for a different tense than the rest of the documents. Don't even bother with the rephrasing tool unless you want a good laugh. While technically the words it suggests mean the same thing, they're formulated in a way that reveals it's not human and would leave your readers baffled if not guffawing. So embarrassing they'd actually put this on the market. How have they not walked into the sea out of shame? 😆

2026幎3月15日
自発的なレビュヌ

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

䌁業は、自動招埅を介しおレビュヌを䟝頌するこずができたす。この方法で埗られたレビュヌは、本物の経隓に基づいたものであり、確認枈みのラベルが付䞎されたす。

他の皮類のレビュヌに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報