Lewis Lawyers レビュー 

1
•
TrustScore 5段階評価の3

3.2

レビューはレビュアーの個人的な意見であるため、特定の記載内容を検証することはありません。ただし、ビジネス上の取引が行われたことを確認できた場合、レビューに「確認済み」のラベルを付ける場合があります。詳細はこちら

プラットホームの健全性を維持するため、当社のプラットフォーム上のすべてのレビューは、確認済みか否かにかかわらず、年中無休で稼働する自動ソフトウェアによって審査されています。このテクノロジーは、本当の経験に基づいていないレビューなど、ガイドラインに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削除するよう設計されています。ただし、すべてを検知できるわけではありませんので、お気づきの点がございましたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳細はこちら

3.2

まあまあ

TrustScore 5段階評価の3

1件のレビュー

5つ星
4つ星
3つ星
2つ星
1つ星

レビュー依頼の記録がありません

この企業は顧客にレビューを依頼していないため、レビューが全体の意見を反映していない可能性があります。

この企業のTrustpilot 利用方法

レビューや評価の取得方法、スコアリング、モデレーションのプロセスについて確認する。

3.2

すべてのレビュー

(1)

過去12か月のレビュー数: 1件

レビューを書く

レビューの確認を行います

Trustpilot に参加している企業は、インセンティブを提供したり、レビューを非表示にするためにお金を払ったりすることは許可されていません。レビューはレビュアーの個人的な意見で、Trustpilot のものではありません。詳細はこちら

5つ星のうち1の評価

If you are considering hiring Lewis &…

If you are considering hiring Lewis & Lewis, Attorneys at Law, PLLC, you should carefully consider my experience. My experience with Andrew Lewis includes the following: 1.

He represented both the executor and me, a beneficiary of the estate. After I later learned this dual representation should not have occurred, he terminated my representation while continuing to represent the executor, who remained his client for approximately five years. Although he stated in writing that my $1,500 retainer would be returned, he has refused to refund it despite repeated requests. 2.

He agreed to notify my attorney before the executor accessed the estate's safe deposit box so that the contents could be properly monitored and protected. He failed to provide that notice and, according to documents in my possession, intentionally misled both me and my attorney regarding the access. 3. He prepared and provided the legal documents that enabled the executor to obtain access to the estate's safe deposit box.

The executor subsequently accessed the safe deposit box without notifying me or my attorney, removed the estate's gold coins, and later sold them without my knowledge. 4. He later represented to both me and my attorney that he was not involved in obtaining access to the safe deposit box. My attorney has a written statement documenting those representations, and I possess documentary evidence establishing his involvement.

5. He disclosed documents I had provided to him as my attorney to another attorney, who then used those documents in support of a sanctions motion against me after I sought the executor's removal. Those documents were confidential and protected by the attorney-client relationship. 6.

I gave Andrew Lewis multiple opportunities over an extended period to resolve these matters amicably, including returning my retainer as he had promised in writing. He has refused to do so. These events occurred while Andrew Lewis continued representing the executor. The executor was ultimately removed by the probate court after findings that included breach of fiduciary duties, gross misconduct, misapplication and/or embezzlement, fraud, and defalcation.

I intentionally did not initially present these concerns regarding Andrew Lewis to the court because I wanted to resolve the matter in good faith and without litigation. Unfortunately, despite numerous opportunities, no good-faith resolution has occurred. I will now be seeking appropriate relief from the court, requesting any relief or sanctions the court deems appropriate, and filing complaints with the appropriate regulatory and consumer agencies, including the Texas State Bar. I was also advised to file a theft report, because I can show intent and this would be a felony based on the amount.

I will provide supporting documentation demonstrating both the facts described above and my repeated good-faith efforts to resolve this matter before pursuing formal remedies.

If this was an honest firm, they should just have honored their agreement to return my retainer as opposed to getting to this point! I hope my experience helps you make an informed decision before choosing legal representation.

Update: Andy Lewis responded to my demand by offering to refund my retainer only if I first removed my review. I did not view that as a good-faith effort to resolve the dispute, as it conditioned any refund on removing my public review before payment was made, since had already agreed in writing once.

His response also included a bad faith act of a threat: If I did not agree to the terms, I should expect a demand letter followed by a defamation lawsuit.

I interpreted this as an indication that, absent acceptance of his conditions, he intended to pursue legal action against me. Everything stated in my review is based on my personal experience and is supported by documentation that I have retained, including photographs, correspondence, contracts, and other records. I stand behind the accuracy of my review and believe it fairly reflects the facts as I experienced them.

2026年7月22日
自発的なレビュー

レビューの対象になっている企業の方へ

プロフィールを登録して、Trustpilot の無料ビジネス ツールにアクセスし、お客様とのつながりを広げてください。

無料アカウントを取得

Trustpilot エクスペリエンス

Trsutpilot のレビューは誰でも書くことができます。レビューを書いた人には自分の書いたレビューをいつでも編集したり削除したりする権限があり、それらのレビューはアカウントがアクティブである限り表示されます。

プラットフォーム保護のため、専門チームと高度なテクノロジーを駆使しています。偽レビューとの闘いについての詳細はこちらをご一読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュー プロセスの詳細についてはこちらをご覧ください。

よいレビューを書くための8つのヒントをご覧ください。

確認を行うことで、Trustpilot に投稿されるレビューが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実在の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によって書かれたものであることの保証につながります。

レビューに対してインセンティブを提供したり、選択的にレビューを依頼したりすることは、TrustScore にバイアスを生む可能性があります。これは 当社のガイドラインに反します。

詳細情報