Maersk Group レビュー 218

TrustScore 5段階評価の1

1.2

レビューはレビュアーの個人的な意見であるため、特定の記載内容を検証することはありません。ただし、ビジネス上の取引が行われたことを確認できた場合、レビューに「確認済み」のラベルを付ける場合があります。詳細はこちら

プラットホームの健全性を維持するため、当社のプラットフォーム上のすべてのレビューは、確認済みか否かにかかわらず、年中無休で稼働する自動ソフトウェアによって審査されています。このテクノロジーは、本当の経験に基づいていないレビューなど、ガイドラインに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削除するよう設計されています。ただし、すべてを検知できるわけではありませんので、お気づきの点がございましたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳細はこちら

レビュアーのコメントを見てみましょう

5つ星のうち1の評価

Never had such a terrible experience with a delivery. Waiting 3 weeks for shipment. Yesterday he said attempt failed because he didn’t have the code to the gate. He was seen driving around the parking... もっと見る

5つ星のうち1の評価

Drivers be aware! If you value your time. Do yourself a favor and avoid this company. Arrived at 6:20 am door of driver's entrance. Push ring door bell, Some odd sounding lady said put on your safe v... もっと見る

5つ星のうち1の評価

Absolute garbage shipping company’s website. Tracking info states a phone call appointment was made for delivery that never happened. The website is practically broken. I tried to submit my informatio... もっと見る

5つ星のうち1の評価

If I could give zero star I would. They brought a refrigerator for delivery and left saying they don’t remove the refrigerator door. They don’t have any shoe cover, they don’t have anything to bring... もっと見る


連絡先

1.2

ひどい

TrustScore 5段階評価の1

218件のレビュー

5つ星
4つ星
3つ星
2つ星
1つ星

ネガティブなレビューに回答していません

この企業のTrustpilot 利用方法

レビューや評価の取得方法、スコアリング、モデレーションのプロセスについて確認する。

Trustpilot に参加している企業は、インセンティブを提供したり、レビューを非表示にするためにお金を払ったりすることは許可されていません。レビューはレビュアーの個人的な意見で、Trustpilot のものではありません。詳細はこちら

5つ星のうち1の評価

Dear Maersk

Dear Maersk
You have obviously not understood the message. One cannot trade with the enemy and the West at the same time. If one does, it "supports" Putin's war. You're going to appear as lackeys to a killer .... nothing nice to post and it's going to be expensive in the long run ... believe me.
You are some very small people who unfortunately only think of yourself and your piggy bank. Not particularly charming.
I am ashamed on behalf of Denmark and Ukraine.

2022年3月10日
自発的なレビュー
5つ星のうち1の評価

Pengegriske er i!

Hvordan kan i overhovedet se jer selv i øjnene?! At sende skibe til Rusland!! Føj!! I er en skændsel for Danmark!! Havde Arnold kunne se hvilken vanære i påføre Danmark var han stået op fra sin grav! Penge er ikke alt!! Kald det skib hjem!! F.T.U!! 🇺🇦🙏 🕊️

2022年2月25日
自発的なレビュー
5つ星のうち1の評価

Maersk Line act in a cavalier manner…

Maersk Line act in a cavalier manner towards their clients. They issue bogus invoices and then insist upon payment before they release containers at destination. Even when an invoice is rejected and that rejection is accepted, they STILL insist on payment before release of cargo. Think very carefully before using Maersk, they are dangerous and do not care!!!

2022年1月25日
自発的なレビュー
5つ星のうち1の評価

Virksomheden støtter korruption og udgør crimes against humanity

Endnu en trist sag. TVANG!!! ULOVLIGT!!!
Bryder/ødelægger demokratiet og har overtrådt grundloven samt Nuremberg codes for deres kraftige restriktioner af covidpas

Sars-cov-2 er ikke isoleret og derfor er der ingen af vaccinerne der virker men blot er en test for at gøre samtlige mennesker til labrats for et agenda der ej handler om sikkerhed og eller sundhed.
Rigtig helbredelse af sygdomme holdes skjult under en meget ond dagsorden.

I skulle skamme jer!

Nurembergs 10 koder;

1 The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.

2 The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
3 The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
4 The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results justify the performance of the experiment.
5 The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
6 No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
7 The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
8 Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability or death.
9 The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. 10 The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.

For more information see Nuremberg Doctor's Trial, BMJ 1996;313(7070):1445-75.

2021年11月8日
自発的なレビュー
5つ星のうち1の評価

Maersk mandate Vaccine for workers in denmark

Hey, do not use maersk. They have just enforced a Vaccine mandate for their employees in Denmark supporting the agenda to split the population in 2, the vaccinated and the unvaccinated. Do not support thies big companys that does not let the workers have a free chooise. This is a disgusting way of running a business and should be illegal. If you work for maersk you should quit your job and support the fight for medical freedom the freedom of chooise... Peace

2021年11月4日
自発的なレビュー
5つ星のうち1の評価

Made an online enquiry for EU to EU…

Made an online enquiry for EU to EU container service providing all the necessary information from the outset. Several exchanges took place over ten days only to be finally told that they don't cover the route. Customer services need re-training for not knowing where they can ship and send to. Really wasted my time.

2021年10月12日
自発的なレビュー

Trustpilot エクスペリエンス

Trsutpilot のレビューは誰でも書くことができます。レビューを書いた人には自分の書いたレビューをいつでも編集したり削除したりする権限があり、それらのレビューはアカウントがアクティブである限り表示されます。

企業は、自動招待を介してレビューを依頼することができます。この方法で得られたレビューは、本物の経験に基づいたものであり、確認済みのラベルが付与されます。

他の種類のレビューについての詳細はこちらをご一読ください。

プラットフォーム保護のため、専門チームと高度なテクノロジーを駆使しています。偽レビューとの闘いについての詳細はこちらをご一読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュー プロセスの詳細についてはこちらをご覧ください。

よいレビューを書くための8つのヒントをご覧ください。

確認を行うことで、Trustpilot に投稿されるレビューが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実在の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によって書かれたものであることの保証につながります。

レビューに対してインセンティブを提供したり、選択的にレビューを依頼したりすることは、TrustScore にバイアスを生む可能性があります。これは 当社のガイドラインに反します

詳細情報