Peter Storm レビュヌ 

165
•
TrustScore 5段階評䟡の1.5

1.4

レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら

レビュアヌのコメントを芋おみたしょう

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

I purchased a pair of Peter Storm boots for a charity walk over Dartmoor, these were not cheap boots costing £70 but I opted to invest in what I believed to be a reputable name. Other than the 10 m... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち2の評䟡

I had a lovely mustard colour duffel coat, from the Peter storm range, but after one winter the zip as broken, comes open from the bottom, does not stay connected from the bottom to the top,! but th... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Just awful...Peter Storm Snowden 2 walking boots. Stitching to rear of both boots failed after just 4 short hikes, causing ny teenage son ankle issues. Bought feom Go outdoors store who were... もっず芋る

䌁業情報

Peter Storm に぀いお

圓該䌁業による蚘述


連絡先

1.4

ひどい

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の1.5

165件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

最近のレビュヌ䟝頌の蚘録はありたせん

この䌁業は最近、顧客にレビュヌを䟝頌しおいないため、レビュヌが党䜓の意芋を反映しおいない可胜性がありたす。

Trustpilot では、本物の人間によるコンテンツに重きを眮いおいたす。ただし、この䌁業は返信原皿の䜜成に圹立぀ AI 支揎ツヌルにもアクセスするこずができたす。

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

1.4

すべおのレビュヌ

(165)

過去12か月のレビュヌ数: 16ä»¶

レビュヌを曞く
Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Peter Storm boots, not the quality I had hoped for or expected..

I purchased a pair of Peter Storm boots for a charity walk over Dartmoor, these were not cheap boots costing £70 but I opted to invest in what I believed to be a reputable name.
Other than the 10 mile charity walk I have worn them only on 4 or 5 other occasions, just as regular boots with jeans. So as you can imagine I am very disappointed now with one of the boots, falling apart after such minimal use. Having read many other similar complaints, with failing products in very similar circumstances on trust pilot, I feel it only right to share my experience and having contacted both Peter Storm and the shop that sold them, the seller in all fairness did accept the return and refund me, but no response from Peter Storm which I find equally as poor.

2025幎5月31日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち3の評䟡

Rubbish hood when windy.

I bought the Peter Parka 3rd edition and it is waterproof so far... I like that it has 7 pockets and is quite warm only designed for winter times in the UK. I wouldn't wear this in any other colder climates as I don't think it would be warm enough. Unfortunately the biggest issue with this coat is when you have your hood up on a windy day/night it just blows off, it doesn't stay on your head. They should test these coats out properly before they sell them.

2026幎2月11日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Poor quality

Bought pair of waking boots for my wife and myself (Go Outdoors) and after two month "top coating of leather Ha Ha" peeling and lettiing in water, poor quality.)

2026幎2月8日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

£70 for rubbish boots

I paid £70 for a pair of walking boots less than a year ago. Don't really use them for rough walking, just general wear round garden and workshop, but they are in bits! The leather is coming away, the stitching has undone and the sole is coming apart from the uppers. In short, they are rubbish - the £15 pair I bought from Temu have lasted better.

2025幎2月1日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち2の評䟡

Shoddy

I bought my walking boots 18 months ago & wear them twice a month to walk approximately 12 miles.
About 6 months ago one of the fastening hooks came off & fortunately, my local shoe repairer managed to refix it. Now another, different hook has dropped off. I have tried to contact the Peter Storm customer website using the two numbers given, only to hear an automated list of numbers for irrelevant departments. There is no option to discuss ‘Complaints’ or ‘Other’ matters. I am not satisfied with this lack of willingness to assist with their defective products - hence this review.
I do NOT recommend Peter Storm walking boots.

2025幎11月21日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

It’s only got a 1 star because it won’t


It’s only got a 1 star because it won’t let me give a zero. Padded jacket worn probably a couple of dozen times and it’s already coming apart on the seams and linings on the pocket are too baggy and constantly get caught in the zip and rip. Primark clothing is a better quality than this absolute garbage.

2025幎10月30日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち2の評䟡

I had a lovely mustard colour duffel


I had a lovely mustard colour duffel coat, from the Peter storm range, but after one winter the zip as broken, comes open from the bottom, does not stay connected from the bottom to the top,! but there is no one to contact, the coat is still in perfect condition but not wearable,,
As an elderly person a good warm winter coat is a most, I am so disappointed, hoping that a good coat would survive more than one winter,
With minimal wear,

2025幎10月27日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Peter Storm 'waterproof' coat saturated on 2nd use in rain.

Bought a Peter Storm 'waterproof' coat with a fleece liner in Go Outdoors Bedford for a trip to the Lake District. First used in light rain around Derwent for 4-5 hours with no issues on 19/10/25. Today (21/10/2025) it received around an hour of moderate rain around Buttermere and is saturated inside and out - along with everything I had in the pockets. I could actually see what waterproofing had been applied sloughing off as a soapy residue.

I wish I had read the reviews of Peter Storm products before buying because I also have a pair of walking boots from the same brand.

Needless to say, the coat is going back on my return home, but I'm left with the option of spending time and more money buying another one while I'm here or getting soaked to the skin a few more times. I'll never buy anything made by this brand again.

EDIT: 10/11/25. You won't be surprised to learn that the boots leaked like a sieve as well. By the time they had dried out I'd bought a new pair and a coat in Keswick. The only plus was the retailer refunded both items in full with an apology when I went back and explained what had happened.

Also, to be fair, as far as fleeces go Peter Storm are decent value when compared with other brands; I just wouldn't trust them with anything that's supposed to be waterproof.

2025幎10月21日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Be warned: poor quality products, poor customer service

What was once a great brand is reduced to rubbish; see the other reviews here. I bought a waterproof coat at Go Outdoors last year, supposedly reduced from £125 to £75. The main zip degraded and lifted from the fabric after just 18 months of not exactly heavy use, and cannot be closed - making the coat useless. I still have the receipt and original tags. I did not want a refund, just a replacement waterproof coat. The staff instore at Go Outdoors could not help as it was over one year and referred me back to the 'Peter Storm' website, telling me the product had a 2-year manufacturer's warranty. There is no real content on Peter Storm's website and the only contact/phone number takes you to... Millets. All these companies are part of the JD Sports empire. After getting through on the phone after going through multiple options, the line was shocking, the guy tried to help, went away and came back a few times, didn't seem to understand my enquiry, and then told me that 'Peter Storm' only had a maximum one-year warranty, despite what I have been told by Go Outdoors. So be warned. I suppose you get what you pay for, and I will not buy again the cheaply mass-produced rubbish now being sold under the Peter Storm brand. Shame. And given the customer service experience, will think twice about buying again from Go Outdoors.

2025幎10月21日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち4の評䟡

Wouldn't be without them

Bought a pair of Peter Storm walking trousers last year, 2024. Very versatile having zip off legs for crops and shorts too. Are good quality material and well made. Wash and wear very easily. Wouldn't be without them

2024幎9月8日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Peter Storm Caldbeck walking boots

Peter Storm Caldbeck walking boots. Don’t buy! After 6 months the insole started to break up, just after 1 year the sole on 1 boot is coming off and the stitching on both boots is coming apart. The boots are used for dog walking twice a day and were regularly cleaned and treated.

2025幎7月1日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Not quite six months old

Bought the boots last November used them daily for taking the dog for a walk. No longer than two hours a day. Last month (April) whilst out walking I noticed the right boot feeling loose so checked the lace, it was the sole detaching from the upper. Less than six months wear and now useless.

2025幎4月18日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

I bought a pair of Peter Storm walking


I bought a pair of Peter Storm walking shoes in August 2023. They were worn for dog walking, up to around 1 hour a day at the most. They were around £80, and were advertised as waterproof. I re-proofed them a number of times, but they did get frequently wet and muddy. After 8 months one of the soles came away from the upper part of the shoe. I was given a free replacement of the same shoes by Go Outdoors, where I bought the original pair. After another 11 months the exact same fault has occurred. I won’t bother Go Outdoors again, and I definitely won’t be buying any more Peter Storm footwear.

2025幎4月7日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Peter Storm Walking boots

Peter Storm Walking boots with storm grip soles. The first time I wore them in town to break them in it was damp and I slipped on a metal manhole cover. I put that down to the rubber needing the shine taken off it. Later I had to be air-lifted off the mountain near my home due to slipping on on a damp rock. Today I decided to wear them on a walk around the lanes, unfortunatly it began to rain on the the way back and I slipped twice in matter of seconds, IN MY OWN DRIVEWAY. I will be destroying then when the rain stops. The ONLY reason I gave one star was because I couldn't give zero.

2025幎2月23日
自発的なレビュヌ

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

䌁業は、自動招埅を介しおレビュヌを䟝頌するこずができたす。この方法で埗られたレビュヌは、本物の経隓に基づいたものであり、確認枈みのラベルが付䞎されたす。

他の皮類のレビュヌに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報