CPS Homes レビュヌ 

1,306
•
TrustScore 5段階評䟡の4.5

4.3

レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら

レビュアヌのコメントを芋おみたしょう

5぀星のうち5の評䟡

Adam, the letting agent was incredibly helpful securing our house and event sprinted back to the letting agency to make sure that our group would be signed on the property before anyone else got to it... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち5の評䟡

I have recently transferred my properties to CPS and can say with hand on heart that they are the most professional company who I have dealt with, They are sincere, honest and very much hands on wi... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち5の評䟡

We came to visit the office to find a student house for second year of university. During our house viewings amber was happy to answer any questions and was very positive throughout. Amber made the wh... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち4の評䟡

Gemma was a very approachable and helpful member of staff, she met our needs immediately and made sure that we were comfortable and happy with the houses that we were viewing. overall, all the staff w... もっず芋る

䌁業情報

  1. 䞍動産業者

圓該䌁業による蚘述

Cardiff-based letting and estate agency. Experts in buying, selling, renting and property management. We're Cardiff's biggest student housing provider.


連絡先

4.3

優良

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の4.5

1306件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

最近のレビュヌ䟝頌の蚘録はありたせん

この䌁業は最近、顧客にレビュヌを䟝頌しおいないため、レビュヌが党䜓の意芋を反映しおいない可胜性がありたす。

ネガティブなレビュヌの 100に回答しおいたす

通垞24時間以内に回答

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

4.3

すべおのレビュヌ

(1,306)

過去12か月のレビュヌ数: 94ä»¶

レビュヌを曞く
Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Cannot recommend them less (AVOID!!) they are frauds and liars with appalling communication (sorry for abbreviations there's a character limit)

We moved out in July2023 but Trustpilot doesn’t accept reviews from >1yr. Please excuse this error. The review was removed without our knowledge so we are uploading it again now.
Now that we have experience with other Cardiff estate agents, we wanted to post our review. Our experience had many issues.
CPS did not tell us about the incredibly loud construction work next door that caused our wall to shake and claimed to have never been notified. However, in discussions with the contractors & landlords next door, we discovered they had been notified & granted the proper permissions. Either the chain of information at CPS is that poor, or they lied to us.
Any minor damage was immediately assumed to be entirely our fault and seized upon as an excuse to retain our deposit. They wanted to charge us to send a contractor to put a new mattress cover on the bed, even though we had discussed beforehand and provided a brand new one when we moved out. When we questioned their logic, they immediately dropped the issue, so they knew it was nonsense to begin with. We only seemed to be notified about property viewings the legally minimum time beforehand.
Following a reply we got from CPS initially (b4 mysteriously removed)
A contractor was drilling into the party wall next door & causing picture frames to fall. The landlord was aware & omitted this information as we know landlord recommended the building works to them. When we emailed about the noise, they pretended they didn't know. The landlord on our contract was also a member of staff at CPS, so CPS must have known about works. We learned the landlord could be the owner of CPS, as we were told he owns lots of properties in Cardiff.
Our inspection said everything was perfect when we moved out & we would receive full deposit back. We emailed many times to confirm before signing the agreement, as we heard that CPS tried to take deposits from other tenants & we wanted written confirmation before agreeing (watch 'Joe Lycett's Got Your Back'). 2 wks after moving out & another couple living there, we received a reply of 'we would have loved to give you your deposit back but unfortunately we can't', for 'stains on a mattress' that didn’t exist. They wanted £50 from our deposit for a mattress protector for ‘stains’ when we had just bought a new one for them. When we challenged them, they decided they didn’t need the money anymore. It’s clear they’ll try & take money from anyone they can.
We also experienced at least one instance of not being given 24 hours notice of a viewing, & also told of a viewing & not notified when it was cancelled. Instead we heard nothing from CPS & they didn’t show up. Finally, the flat was poorly refitted. Every time we used the washing machine, the entire flat shook. There was no window in the bathroom, nor was the ventilation strong enough often resulting in mould, no matter how much drying or wiping we did.
New edit following CPS reply:
1we had to replace the freezer door - in fact the whole drawer due to the company not having spare parts- & it was £30 - or we would be charged for it – that’s what we were told. secondly we had been told by the contractor that previous tenants also broke it, because it was so cheap & poorly made. You couldn’t defrost freezer w/o switching the whole fridge-freezer off at the plug (not feasible so caused a massive build-up of ice)
2the door hit into its overhead closer –which the previous tenants had at their viewing, we had at ours & the viewings after us had- & this was never repaired. that's at least 2 years without repairing it- completely dispelling the myth you immediately repair everything (what a ridiculous claim).the bed slat was not our fault & therefore irrelevant.
3.we had to contest the mattress charge; the landlord did not graciously wave the charge. you did not ‘advise’ the landlord, we provided PROOF over the course of several emails that the ‘staining’ on the mattress was not our doing - & a mattress protector would not repair/replace this anyway. AND this was put in a rude email 2 WEEKS after we moved out, w/new tenants the day after we left- not at check out inspection.
4you had to be notified – legally – & give consent. Liars.
5according to HM land registry the landlord has owned the building since 2017 – not ‘recently’ - nearly 5 years from when we moved in & enough time to tell tenants & future tenants
6. also they forgot the mid tenancy inspection & scheduled an inspection whilst we were moving out – 2 weeks b4 check-out date
their reply proves they’re liars & desperate for a ‘good reputation’ to try & scam more people as they have before. i wholeheartedly promise my review is accurate - i don't want any1 to lose money on these frauds. despite their claims, the landlord is likely to be the owner of CPS & act w only their best interests at heart.
kindest regards
farzana

2023幎12月21日
自発的なレビュヌ
CPS Homes ロゎ

CPS Homes からの回答

Hi Farzana,

Thank you for leaving a review. We’re sorry that your experience with CPS Homes hasn’t been a positive one.

We’ve looked back and can see that you only reported one maintenance issue during your 12-month tenancy. This was a bathroom light switch sometimes not working, which was resolved within 3 working days. We identified a few other minor, mainly cosmetic issues ourselves when we attended for an inspection. You hadn’t reported these, but we wanted them resolved for you. We promptly fed our findings back to your landlord and they had somebody attend to resolve them within 3 working days. Among the issues noted were a snapped bed slat, which your landlord deemed was not your responsibility. The attending contractor deemed a cracked freezer drawer was caused through misuse, but your landlord chose not to apply a charge for this. We highlight these elements because we think they demonstrate diligent management of what was a recently-refurbished property with very few issues, with fairness and transparency applied throughout – all of which is at odds to the picture you have painted in your review.

In terms of the construction work, as previously advised, your landlord disputes that they had knowledge of any building work being done next door. When somebody applies to the local authority to obtain planning permission to do work, the local authority follows a prescribed process, which includes notifying neighbouring properties of the application. Crucially, it doesn’t say when the work will be done, as the applicant doesn’t need to specify when – or indeed if – they intend to do work. Additionally, neighbouring properties are not automatically informed of the final decision on a planning application by the local authority, so won’t necessarily know if it was granted or refused. Planning permission is typically valid for 3 years, so permission could’ve been obtained up to 3 years prior to the work being started. Bearing in mind the landlord had only recently bought the property when your tenancy began, it’s wholly possible they weren’t aware of the planning application. And, as stated, they’re only informed of the application, not the decision or indeed when the work will be done.

We document the condition of each property at the end of the tenancy (as we also do at the beginning of each tenancy), then provide this report to the landlord for their assessment, as – being the owner of the property – they are the decision maker. Within the report, we highlight items that we believe are a result of wear and tear, therefore the responsibility of the landlord to make good before any new contract-holders arrive. We also highlight any items we believe to be over and beyond fair wear and tear, which – if substantially different to the condition at the start of the tenancy – they may wish to claim from the deposit for. When we completed your check-out inspection, we noted a stained mattress, which your landlord initially indicated they would like to make a small claim for (£40 to supply and fit a mattress protector). However, when we advised your landlord that the similar staining was present upon move-in, they agreed to drop the charge, and you were refunded your full deposit within 10 working days of your tenancy ending.

Finally, we provide at least 24 hours’ notice of any viewings or inspections, though if a maintenance issue is reported and we can have a contractor attend sooner than 24 hours’ time, we will always aim to do so as we assume that occupiers would prefer to have the issue rectified sooner rather than later. Contractors often get last-minute slots available in their diaries, so we try to fill them as it can sometimes be days until they get another slot. However, if an occupier indicates that they’d prefer to wait at least 24 hours for a contractor to attend, we will of course follow their instruction on that.

Kind regards,

The CPS Homes Team.

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Shame on this company

Shame on this company, what a shame!!
After 5 years as a good tenant I'm having a nightmare, it's been 52 days since I handed over the keys and I'm fighting to get my deposit back.

5 years ago they did not make a photographic report claiming that there was no technology for this and now after 5 years they took photos of every centimeter, even photos of human hair were taken, trying to put as much difficulty and trouble as possible to delay the return.

It is very difficult to deal with the deposit team, I tried to schedule a meeting to inform them of how the apartment was handed over to us and they refused.

I will recommend everyone when trying to rent from this company, MAKE SURE THAT YOU TAKE PICTURES OF EVERY SINGLE CENTIMETRE OF THE HOUSE OR FLAT AND WRITE DOWN EVERY SINGLE PROBLEM FROM THE TOP TO THE BOTTOM EVEN IF YOU FIND A HUMAN HAIR IN THE FLOOR AND SEND THE INVENTORY FOR THEIR TO SIGN, AND KEEP THIS WITH YOU VERY SAFE COZ IF YOU DO NOT DO THIS, THEN THEY WILL DO IT WHEN YOU LEAVE AND YOU WILL HAVE THE SAME PROBLEM WHICH I AM HAVING NOW.

I hope no one goes through this situation I'm going through, it's embarrassing.

2024幎12月6日
自発的なレビュヌ
CPS Homes ロゎ

CPS Homes からの回答

Hi Cristian,

Thanks for your review. We’re aware that you’re currently in discussion with our team, who are liaising with you and your landlord regarding the landlord’s claim from your deposit. Bear in mind that occupation contracts are between the contract-holder(s) and the landlord, so it’s the landlord who chooses to submit this claim. We would much prefer not to have to make a claim from a deposit, as it's far quicker and easier to return a deposit in full. There have been delays in this return process, which we apologise for, though they have not been at CPS Homes’ end. The delays initially occurred whilst we attempted to ascertain what your landlord’s claim was, and subsequently when we’ve been negotiating with him on your behalf to have him reduce the amount of the claim.

To explain further, our contract with the landlord stipulates that we will document the condition of the property at the end of the tenancy (as we also do at the beginning of each tenancy), then provide this report to them for their assessment, as – again – being the owner of the property, they are the decision maker. Within the report, we highlight items that we believe are a result of wear and tear, therefore the responsibility of the landlord to make good before any new contract-holders arrive. We also highlight any items we believe to be over and beyond fair wear and tear, which – if substantially different to the condition at the start of the tenancy – they may wish to claim for from the deposit.

When you moved in, you signed an inventory that read “unless otherwise stated, the condition of the property
is clean and ready for occupation”. You didn’t note any cleaning concerns on the document. We have significant evidence that cleaning was required when you left. You even offered to return to the property clean the areas of concern, though we cannot allow contract-holders to access the property again after their tenancy has finished.

Once the landlord has decided how they wish to proceed, we add comments to the inspection report and send it over to the contract-holder(s) for their perusal. We invite contract-holders to comment on anything noted as being over and beyond fair wear and tear. This demonstrates a transparent, two-way process that is geared towards avoiding any potential deposit dispute. When contract-holders provide their comments, as we always encourage them to do, we revert back to the landlord and attempt to negotiate the deposit return of behalf of both. This is what we’re doing for you currently.

As you know, the landlord’s claim is not for just cleaning. We have presented you with evidence of other items too.

We feel it's important to point out that it's not uncommon for there to be a dispute at the end of a tenancy. Quite rightly, contract-holders are keen to receive as much of their deposit back as possible, whereas landlords would like to be compensated for any dilapidation they believe is not a result of wear and tear. So, by virtue of their own standpoints, deposit claims are a contentious matter. Thankfully, the process described earlier in this reply successfully resolves the vast majority of potential deposit disputes before they become protracted, which we think is something that should be commended.

As with any deposit return, if a contract-holder feels a landlord's claim is not justified and a mutual agreement cannot be reached, the deposit scheme that protects the deposit can appoint an unbiased, impartial adjudicator to consider all evidence and make a ruling. We're pleased to say that the vast majority of deposits CPS Homes returns are done so with mutual agreement between landlord and contract-holder, meaning only a small minority require independent adjudication. As we’ve been unable to reach an agreement between you and your landlord in this case, an adjudicator is due to look at the case shortly. In the meantime, you have been paid the undisputed portion of your deposit.

Many thanks,

The CPS Homes Team.

5぀星のうち5の評䟡

Outstanding

CPS were recommended to us when we decided to sell our house. They provided an entirely unique experience which reduced the stress significantly. The marketing was incredible and actually made me wonder if I wanted to sell. The sales team were smooth, attentive and highly effective. An outstanding service. Would describe them as 'In a class of their own.'

2024幎11月11日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち2の評䟡

really poor show

really poor show, I am an investor wanting to purchase a buy to let property in Cardiff, CPS where not keen to show me any properties on the first weekend I came to Cardiff, on the second trip they said that they couldn't show me any on the weekend again so I took time off work and travelled up on Friday afternoon to see 4 properties they had for me to view, the day before I was told that 3 of the properties I could no longer see, one had sold (fair enough). An hour before seeing the last after moving the time forward twice I go a call to say the landlord had decided no viewings. I did not feel like they made any effort to accommodate me. I certainly wont be bringing my business to them.

2024幎11月22日
自発的なレビュヌ
CPS Homes ロゎ

CPS Homes からの回答

Dear Roger,

Thank you for sharing your feedback. We sincerely apologise for any frustration caused by the timing of our notifications to you, though please know that we always act swiftly on instructions from property owners and provide as much notice as possible to all parties involved. There are occasions when we’re told late-on that we can’t view a property as intended and, as you note, there are also times when we have a viewing booked in but agree a sale on the property in the meantime.

Your commitment to viewing with us is greatly appreciated, and it’s never our intention to cause disruption to your plans. We understand how much effort goes into making a journey like yours to Cardiff, so we truly regret the inconvenience this situation caused.

While we understand your decision not to engage with us in the future, we’d like to offer an alternative that might help if you reconsider. For any property of interest where timing or travel is a challenge, we’d be happy to arrange an initial video call to ensure it fits your expectations before making the journey.

Please don’t hesitate to reach out if there’s anything further we can do to assist.

All the best,

The CPS Homes Team.

5぀星のうち4の評䟡

The communication was great

The communication was great! Me and my two friends are renting a flat for second year of university and we found a great place for a great price. Even though we had some problems with the agreements of the property, they were quickly sorted and it was all done very professionally. The replies to the emails were exceptional and really helped us to resolve the issue. I want to give a big thanks to Nikki Hamer for the help as she was dealing with our problems with lots of patience. The only constructive criticism that I have is that all of the details should be displayed on the letting of the flat to avoid any confusion. I doubt this is an Issue often so there’s nothing to worry about. This issue was handled by Nikki with great co-operation. Overall , an amazing experience with CPS and would stick with them for my third year housing.

2024幎11月23日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち5の評䟡

As a landlord

As a landlord, I’ve been thoroughly impressed with CPS Homes, especially Kacey. She’s professional, efficient, and always keeps me updated. Her proactive approach and excellent communication make managing my property completely stress-free. I highly recommend CPS Homes, and Kacey in particular, for their outstanding service!

From Nagham Abbass

2024幎11月22日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち5の評䟡

Help with a Smile

Always cheerful Cath is a real joy to deal with. Following the identification of a maintenance issue Cath has calmly and professionally managed the process and identified the root cause. Despite complications Cath has quickly instructed and co-ordinated the resolution among all parties to resolve the issue.

2024幎11月18日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Over-compartmentalised mess

Summary: CPS is a flawed agency which will continue to claim that it is a set of discrete systems which can’t overlap i.e. Deposits, maintenance and lettings “can’t” intercommunicate. This results in a horrendous customer experience wherein you can’t contact any real people and no issues ever get resolved in a timely manner. If you’re a landlord looking to let a property under CPS, I’m sure it’s a profitable experience because you’ll be letting a property to naïve students who won’t know that theyre being taken advantage of. If you’re a student looking to let with CPS, their cheaper rents relative to their quality of service does not work out in your favour so just don’t.

I rented with CPS homes from July 2023–> July 2024 in cathays. This has got to be the worst experience I have ever had as a tenant. The flat looked great when we viewed and the person who showed us around did a really good job of making the place seem nice.

When we moved in this was not the case. The flat was absolutely disgusting: Disgusting communal space, thick black mold on the floor of the bathroom, a sagging floor in that room, other bathroom had a broken seat, flush, and a bit of wee in it, oven was mouldy (which i have never seen before). The smell was indescribable. I had been warned by my coursemates prior to moving in that going with CPS was a bad idea but i didn’t know it would be this bad.

Issues persisted for weeks until CPS ordered a “deep clean” which resulted in the flat being very slightly more livable until we as tenants 3wks post move-in just gave up and did it all ourselves.

We eventually met our maintenance contractor Sas who was an absolute mess. On the first time we met him he told us of a recent bereavement in his family. We were very sympathetic and he did no work that day, sort of just sat on the stairs for the afternoon (which we were fine with).

I personally made contact with CPS to let them know that this man was struggling and unable to complete the work we needed doing. Their flat response on the phone was to state that he was the landlords private contractor or, in person, to say to me that he works on a massive number of properties and that theyve been having issues with him for ages. Either way this doesnt provide him with the support he should have recieved.

As a result, issues which we reported to CPS were not resolved throughout our tenancy. I lived the entire tenancy with a broken bed which i reported multiple times to no avail via their phone number and visits to their office. Our radiators regularly leaked, leading to heating not working and CPS would send a blanket response every time asking us to just top up the radiator- great idea.

Once we fixed most of the issues we had in the flat, the issues stayed fixed (by us) until the end of the tenancy. Once our tenancy finished, however, CPS all of a sudden became a very attentive agency. They were trying to extract money from us for issues that either pre-dated the tenancy, counted as normal wear and tear, or occurred as sontaneous issues between our move-out and the next tenants’ move-in.

The person dealing with our case, Derry Salter, was professional throughout the process however was clearly and plainly trying to extract more money from us (not trying to find the truth of the situation). He would repeatedly play dumb when we would send him evidence of the state of the property pre- vs post- tenancy or he would outright ignore valid defences in favour of nitpicking issues in the landlord’s claim.

Eventually Derry (i assume) made a mistake of threatening to withhold some money which one of my flatmates had overpaid on last years rent (which I should imagine is either not allowed or not legal) and CPS spontaneously retracted their claim. Just a massive waste of my time but probably works out as profitable for a company like CPS.

2024幎11月16日
自発的なレビュヌ
CPS Homes ロゎ

CPS Homes からの回答

Hi Toby,

We're sorry that you've had a less than positive experience, and we thank you for your feedback.

We’d like to clarify that while our departments – such as deposits, maintenance, and lettings – have distinct roles, they do work closely together. For example, our inspections team collaborates with the deposits team as part of the deposit claims process. We recognise that seamless communication between teams is essential for providing a positive customer experience. If there was a breakdown in communication internally or in how we kept you informed, we sincerely apologise. Your feedback highlights an area where we can improve, and we’re committed to learning from this to ensure better coordination and responsiveness in the future.

We've been unable to determine which property you lived in, but we know of the contractor you describe. We must point out that we have a panel of preferred contractors that we instruct to attend properties when a landlord gives us the green light to deal with an issue. This panel is made up of trades who have a proven track record of completing work promptly and to a high standard. This contractor is not on said panel of ours, so will have been instructed by your landlord directly, independent of CPS Homes. Remember that we don't own the properties we manage, so we don't have the final say over who comes out. As the owner of the property, if a landlord wants to take that decision out of our hands and instruct somebody they believe will do the job to their satisfaction, we have to go along with it, even if we disagree. We're sorry that your landlord chose to handle things themselves, and the result was that they appointed a contractor who did not perform to the levels that we have come to expect from our own panel. This feedback is something that we continue to use internally, so we thank you for bringing it to our attention during and post-tenancy.

If we knew which property you occupied, we’d be able to shed more light on the condition upon arrival, i.e. whether the cleaning was also something your landlord independent of CPS Homes, or whether it was instructed by us. Both CPS Homes and the cleaning companies we use realise cleanliness is subjective, so we’re prepared for scenarios where incoming contract-holders don’t think it’s up to the required standard and the companies are happy to re-attend to look over the points of concern; ideally meeting the contract-holder there to discuss any further cleaning needs.

As occupation contracts are between contract-holder(s) and the landlord, any proposed deposit deductions at the end of a tenancy are decided by the landlord. We don’t profit from deductions and prefer to return deposits in full as it’s faster and simpler.

Our contract with landlords requires us to document the property's condition at the start and end of a tenancy, providing this report for their assessment. We highlight wear and tear, which is the landlord’s responsibility to address, and note items that go beyond fair wear and tear, which they may choose to claim from the deposit. Once the landlord decides, we share their comments with contract-holder(s) for review, encouraging them to provide feedback. This transparent process helps avoid disputes, as we work to negotiate deposit returns fairly.

It’s natural for contract-holders to want their full deposit back while landlords seek compensation for damages. These differing perspectives make deposit claims inherently contentious, but our process resolves most disputes before they escalate.

If agreement isn’t reached, the deposit scheme protecting the deposit can appoint an impartial adjudicator. Thankfully, most deposits we handle are returned by mutual agreement, with only a small minority requiring adjudication.

Many thanks,

The CPS Homes Team.

5぀星のうち5の評䟡

As a landlord CPS have been dependable


As a landlord CPS have been dependable and good. The biggest thing for me is good communication. They will ring me promptly if there is a problem and also I can ring them in office hours and talk to a real person who can sort any problem out quickly.
I have had some bad experiences with letting agents in the past so moved to CPS about 3 years ago and so far it’s been an excellent service.

2024幎11月16日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Not good to deal with

Terrible to deal with. Might be good for Landlords but for Tenants expect terrible service.

2024幎11月9日
自発的なレビュヌ
CPS Homes ロゎ

CPS Homes からの回答

Dear Mr White,

We’re sorry that you’ve had a less than positive experience with us. We cannot currently locate you on our database, so in order to verify and learn more about your experience, we’ve approached you via Trustpilot's private messaging platform. We'd appreciate your response to this.

We look forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards,

The CPS Homes Team.

5぀星のうち5の評䟡

CPS Homes have been ruthlessly


CPS Homes have been ruthlessly efficient again. I deal with them on a yearly basis to secure student tenants and they always deliver.
Communication is always excellent and they are extremely pro-active in keeping landlords up to date with maintenance and contract matters.
I dealt with Rhys on this occasion who was as always, excellent.

2024幎11月5日
自発的なレビュヌ

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報