レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら

レビュアヌのコメントを芋おみたしょう

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Please DO NOT SIGN UP for this program. They do not honor their end of the bargain. I was told numerous times that ALL of my previous physicians would be added to my care plan, only to have to jump t... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち5の評䟡

The front end experience of making sure your provider is on the list or getting them added if they aren't feels a little tedious, but I love this service so much!!!! I was shocked how great this works... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち5の評䟡

Garner has been amazing to work with - the benefits almost feel too good to be true, but they really are! I recently had a medical emergency and, for the first time, didn't hesitate to go to the ER. K... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち5の評䟡

Ever since I joined this program, I've been pleasantly surprised at how the program works! I have such a great company that I work for and they afford us every opportunity to become health conscious,... もっず芋る

䌁業情報

  1. 健康保険代理店

圓該䌁業による蚘述

Garner Health is a technology company on a mission to transform the healthcare economy and deliver high-quality and affordable care for all. Our goal is to change how our healthcare system works at its core. Using a new approach to data science and novel financial incentives, we help patients identify the highest-quality doctors and help doctors improve how they practice medicine. We seek to change the economics of healthcare so that providers thrive by practicing the best medicine, not by performing more invasive procedures. Garner uses one of the nation's most robust medical datasets, covering over 60 billion medical records from 320 million patients, and over 550 proprietary clinical metrics to identify the best doctors in the nation. Garner then creates meaningful financial incentives for patients to see these providers. When members use Garner to find a Top Provider, Garner can reimburse their out-of-pocket costs, including copays, office visits, medical tests, and surgeries. With Garner Assistant, members can find Top Providers who are in-network, available, and nearby, understand their benefits, and book appointments, with a dedicated concierge team available along the way. Today, more than 800 employers trust Garner to help over 2.5 million people get better care. Employers see 12% lower plan costs on average, employees pay 80% less out-of-pocket to see the best doctors, and Garner has saved employers over $1 billion to date.


連絡先

4.2

ほが満足

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の4

176件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

顧客にレビュヌを䟝頌しおいたす

この䌁業は、ポゞティブかネガティブかを問わず、顧客にレビュヌを䟝頌しおいたす。

ネガティブなレビュヌに回答しおいたせん

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

4.2

すべおのレビュヌ

(176)

過去12か月のレビュヌ数: 176ä»¶

レビュヌを曞く
Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち3の評䟡

Constantly requesting review of claims

Although I did end up having a lot of expenses reimbursed through Garner, I found myself having to continuously dispute claims that were originally deemed not covered when they should’ve been. Ultimately garner did follow through and reimburse however the process of appealing most claims was time consuming and unnecessary

2026幎7月29日
5぀星のうち3の評䟡

Good concept, mediocre coverage

Good concept, but very limited choices of physicians that are covered in the program. My family see many specialists but more than half of these specialists are not covered. Also, I cannot choose a practice, have to choose a specific doctor. Even if the doctor is covered, when I go to see my doctor but end up seeing his NP or PA, it's not covered.

Here are some real numbers to illustrate the point: YTD my family has spent more than $7000 out of pocket (after insurance paid their portion), and we got less than $300 back with the Garner program.

2026幎7月29日
5぀星のうち2の評䟡

Hard to get the money out of you when the reporting is terrible!

It is a good way to get some money back you do not make it easy, your reporting sucks!!! I mean really really terrible. almost every charge that is eligible is marked ineligible and I have to dispute them in the app one by one. I do appreciate you have made disputing easier in the app vs talking to a customer service person but if you are going to be so terrible at matching charges to physicians could you at-least create a bulk way to dispute them so I do not have to do it one by one!

2026幎7月29日
5぀星のうち5の評䟡

1st time Garner user

I used Garner for the first time last year and it was great. Almost all my doctors are among their approved providers and I received over $700 in co pay reimbursements over the past year. Everything works great and it’s not costing me anything.

2026幎7月29日

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報