レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら

レビュアヌのコメントを芋おみたしょう

5぀星のうち2の評䟡

Pannenservice am Telefon bestÀtigt, es heißt sie schicken einen Abschlepper raus, der sich dann telefonisch bei mir meldet. Nach 45 Minuten habe ich noch mal angerufen weil sich niemand gemeldet hat.... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Vorrei sottolineare la mancanza di serietà e il totale menefreghismo nei confronti dei clienti. Una persona ha rilevato il nostro leasing chiudendolo e versando la bella cifra di 50 mila euro e dopo u... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Der Support ist extrem unprofessionell Seit 5 Wochen versuche ich ein digitales Problem zu adressieren und einer Lösung zuzufÃŒhren Der angebliche Support reduziert sich auf immer neue Fragen... もっず芋る

䌁業情報

  1. 乗り物・運茞

さたざたな倖郚゜ヌスから提䟛された情報

Mercedes-Benz is a global automobile marque and a division of the German company Daimler AG.


連絡先

1.9

期埅以䞋

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の2

543件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Brand New Mercedes-Benz EQB 250+ Failed on Day One – No Support, No Courtesy Car, Salary Still Deducted

Brand New Mercedes-Benz EQB 250+ Failed on Day One – No Support, No Courtesy Car, Salary Still Deducted

I ordered a brand-new Mercedes-Benz EQB 250+ in November 2025, delivered on 30 January 2026. On the very first day of driving, after approximately 70 miles, the fully charged battery (showing around 320 miles of range) completely drained without warning.

The vehicle became totally inoperable. I could not change gear, the doors locked, and a message appeared stating:
“Consult workshop without changing the transmission position.”

The car has been with the Mercedes dealer since the second day after delivery. Despite this:

Salary deductions have continued.

No courtesy vehicle has been provided.

Communication from both NHS Fleet and Athlon Mobility Lease Ltd has been poor and unsupportive.

There has been no urgency shown despite clear safety concerns.

I issued a formal 14-day notice to both parties requesting rejection of the vehicle. I received no meaningful response. After informing NHS Payroll about the ongoing salary deductions for a vehicle I cannot use, I then received what felt like a threatening letter from NHS Fleet customer service stating that I cannot reject the vehicle, even if faulty.

They stated that because the scheme is administered through my employer, it is considered an unregulated arrangement by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and therefore does not fall under the Consumer Rights Act 2015 or FCA protections.

To summarise:

• A brand-new vehicle failed dangerously on day one.
• The fault has been verified and the vehicle has remained at the dealer since.
• I have had no courtesy car.
• My salary continues to be deducted.
• My formal notice has been dismissed.
• I have been told I have no consumer protection rights.

This experience has been deeply stressful and completely unacceptable. For a scheme designed to support NHS staff, the lack of accountability, empathy, and practical support is shocking.

I would strongly urge NHS Fleet and Athlon Mobility Lease Ltd to review both their safety procedures and their treatment of customers.

2026幎1月31日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

véhicule électrique Mercedes défaillants

Attention l'achat d'un véhicule électrique Mercedes peut vous coûter trÚs cher et je me dois de partager mon expérience. J'ai acheté un véhicule Mercedes 100% électrique EQA il y a quatre ans 40 000€ environ. En mai 2025, en montant dans mon véhicule aprÚs l'avoir stationné deux heures plus tÃŽt, celui-ci ne démarrait pas. Voyant rouge " défaut boite de vitesse". Je fais remorquer le véhicule chez Mercedes. AprÚs un diagnostic (350€), il semble que ce soit le verrou de stationnement. On me présente deux devis. Un devis à 2089 € pour changer le servo moteur qui gÚre le verrou de stationnement et on m'informe que si ce n'est pas le servo moteur, il faudra changer le moteur électrique pour une valeur de 6 431€ qui viennent s'ajouter au 2 089€.
Finalement je m'en sort pour 2 089€ + diagnostic 350€ mais avec peu de répis puisque moins de deux mois plus tard, trois nouveaux voyants rouges s'allument "défaut batterie", "aller au garage sans redémarrer le moteur" " ne pas remorquer le véhicule".
Diagnostic 350€ et verdict: il faut changer le moteur électrique pour 7 255€. Participation de Mercedes 725€
Je demande à ce qu'on me fournisse le diagnostic afin d'en voir les conclusions que voici:
cause possible: Le composant N129 (calculateur électronique de puissance moteur-alternateur) cause le défaut d'isolement.
RemÚde possible : Remplacer le composant N129
En réalité, le réparateur m'indique que pour le moment, Mercedes ne donne pas l'autorisation d'ouvrir les moteurs électriques pour en changer les piÚces ou les composants qui sont à l'intérieur.
Conclusion: au moindre défaut d'un composant, Mercedes fait remplacer le moteur électrique pour 7 255 € à la charge du consommateur. Manifestement Mercedes ne maîtrise pas la technologie de ses moteurs électriques, en fait supporter les frais à ses clients et à l'environnement.

2026幎2月18日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち5の評䟡

Mi agradecimiento a Mercedes Vegar


Mi agradecimiento a Mercedes Vegar Torrevieja. Tuve una avería de pérdida de aceite el mismo día que había realizado el mantenimiento en mi concesionario habitual. Salí de viaje hacia Torrevieja y tuve una pérdida de aceite importante. La grúa me llevo al concesionario Mercedes Vegar Torrevieja. Donde nunca había acudido. Me solucionaron el problema y además documentaron con fotos y vídeo el origen de la avería. También reclamaron el importe de la factura a mi concesionario Mercedes habitual. De la gestión de todo el proceso se encargó el Asesor técnico D. Ismael Jimeno. Mis agradecimientos por el trato recibido.

2026幎1月28日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち4の評䟡

À deux centimÚtres de l’excellence...

AprÚs une analyse approfondie des siÚges arriÚre, je confirme un confort remarquable et une excellente tenue.
Cuir souple, lumiÚre tamisée, tension parfaitement calibrée
 tout frÃŽlait la perfection.
Seul détail technique : l’espace arriÚre semble optimisé pour le romantisme, mais légÚrement restrictif pour les ambitions olympiques.
Quelques centimÚtres supplémentaires seraient appréciés par les utilisateurs
 créatifs.
À quand le pack “Glamour Performance” ? 😌🚗

2026幎2月16日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち5の評䟡

I had an amazing experience buying my new car

I had an amazing experience buying my new car from Mercedes-benz in Northampton UK.
My Salesman was Baldip Kang . From the very start of the process to handover Baldip was polite knowledgeable friendly and very professional without being pushy. All of my questions were answered with precision and confidence. Baldips knowledge of the technology and of the car that I was interested in buying was inspiring. He explained all payment options perfectly but ultimately left the final decision to myself. I bought a Mercedes CLA AMG 200. So far the car has fulfilled all expectations.
Mercedes-benz look after this man Baldip. He is an asset to the company .
Many thanks.
Martin Lovatt.

2026幎2月13日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

I had a part issue !!..

I had a part issue , I rang Head office and told them about my complaint.The issue was raised.Was told someone would get back to me probably within 48hrs .That never happened.So I rang Head office again this time raised a complaint.Still no definitive answer.So poor. I rang Mathew Pearson in Milton Keynes .He sourced the part .And ordered for me .Would highly recommend him.But head office and parts for Mercedes Benz not so much !!Disgruntled customer.Not happy ..

2026幎2月11日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Contratto fraudolento noleggio Smart a lungo termine

Ho resistuito una Smart elettrica dopo 4 anni di noleggio a lungo termine. Avevo nel contratto una franchigia di 500 euro per danni causati per mia colpa o subiti senza sapere il colpevole. Dopo 4 anni, alla restituzione, é venuto il perito che ha scritto: qualche piccolo (millimetrico) borlo sulla carrozzeria (che mi sono trovato), qualche borlo nel montante interno porta (perché la cintura di sicurezza non Ú mai rientrata spontaneamente dall'inizio e quindi il gancio Ú rimasto incastrato nella chiusura). Mi ha addirittura contestato cone danno il consumo della gomma inferiore della portiera lato guida perché ovviamente dopo 4 anni si consuma a forza di entrare basta sfiorarla con la scarpa. Costo stimato riparazione circa 900 euro. Io tranquillo perché la franchigia Ú di 500. Mi addebitano invece tutti i 900 euro. Telefono e mi prendono davvero prr i fondelli. Secondo loro avrei dovuto aprire un sinistro ogni piccolo borlo. Ribatto ovviamente che se ogni riparazione fosse stata, come sarebbe stata, sotto i 500 euro avrei dovuto pagare lo stesso ogni danno. Loro confermano. Quindi attenzione: Ogni minima riga o segno di usura normale del tempo ve la dovete pagare per intero indipendentemente dalla franchigia che avete. Si fa presto con qualche borlo ad arrivare a 1000/2000 euro che, diciamolo chiaramente Ú la rata di chiusura che si sono inventati e di cui non ti dicono niente

2025幎12月30日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち5の評䟡

Finalmente unos profesionales

Hoy después de varios intentos frustrados he sido contactado por Mercedes Murcia ( Amparo Arenas González) que ha resuelto sobre la marcha todos mis problemas de conectividad con el coche. Quiero destacar la amabilidad exquisita de Amparo, y su profesionalidad solucionando en poco tiempo lo que otros ni se molestaron en considerar. Sólo puedo decir es que tan solo con una actitud proactiva se ganan clientes y gracias a eso, Mercedes Murcia se ha ganado uno más. Gracias

2026幎2月4日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Premium badge, budget attitude — my EQS 580 nightmare

Mercedes should be genuinely worried about the volume of bad reviews — because now I understand why they exist.

This review is about a Mercedes EQS 580. After a Tesla Model S (which I was very happy with — if only Musk wasn’t involved), I assumed switching to Mercedes would be a safe, premium choice. I was wrong.

Beyond the endless mechanical issues, what really destroys the experience is the complexity of the software and the total lack of communication. Even worse: the warranty handling feels random — one time it’s covered, the next time it suddenly isn’t, with no clear consistency.

And then there’s another truly irritating part: paying extra for “digital extras” (even the name is laughable). In 2026. I refused to pay, and as a result, several remote/app functions simply disappeared.

Now I see other packages “expiring” too — an Individualisation package (“give your Mercedes more individuality with creative, varying functions”) and an Entertainment package (“always listen to your favourite station in high quality, wherever you drive”). What does this even mean? And, let me guess: they want you to pay again.

The software is equally baffling: compared to Tesla’s interface — which feels as intuitive as an iPhone — the EQS software feels unnecessarily complex and confusing. Even senior Mercedes people have acknowledged to me how complex the EQS software is; the fix is obvious (a proper, full software overhaul/update), but from Mercedes it’s just silence.

This is first-class disappointment. Mercedes seems completely unaware of the damage they’re doing to their brand.

My first Mercedes — and my last.

2026幎2月4日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Pure App rip-off with subscription services!

Bought a car for over 100k CHF and you get treated like you're using a cheap app. As soon as the free period expired, the menu for map updates was simply deleted from the portal entirely. For a premium vehicle costing 100,000+ CHF, it is an absolute disgrace to demand an additional subscription for navigation. Pure rip-off!

2026幎1月31日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

10 years of loyalty, left without support when my car became undrivable -Authorised service, engine failure, no investigation, no support

I am writing this with deep disappointment as a loyal Mercedes-Benz customer and fan of the brand for over 10 years.

My vehicle was purchased from an authorised Mercedes-Benz dealership in Croydon and has been serviced exclusively within the official network for the past four years, at significant personal cost. Shortly after a full authorised service, the engine suffered a serious failure affecting cylinder 1, leaving the car not drivable.

This situation has already caused me additional expenses and stress. What has been most upsetting is the response from management — I was blamed as the customer without any proper technical investigation of my vehicle, and made to feel that responsibility was simply pushed back onto me.

I am sharing photos so others can see what kind of “fault” could realistically belong to a customer who has trusted and paid for authorised servicing for years. The lack of care and empathy shown so far feels unfair and deeply disappointing.

I still want to believe in Mercedes-Benz UK, and I sincerely hope this case will now be reviewed urgently at a senior level and handled in a way that reflects the values the brand claims to stand for.

2025幎11月7日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

RESOLUCION NEGATIVA 1ª ITV A CAUSA DE UN FALLO DE FABRICACIÓN

He tenido un problema con mi vehículo al pasar su 1ª ITV debido al faro izquierdo de color azul

He reclamado al concesionario STERN MOTOR de Sabadell; y me han confirmado que Mercedes Benz no se hace carga de la reparación del vehículo; y me pasan un presupuesto de 2.141,22€

No estamos dispuestos a pagar esta cantidad; y hemos puesto una reclamación / denuncia al taller STERN MOTOR y a la OCU

Solamente queremos que el taller STERN MOTOR y MERCEDES BENZ se hagan cargo de la reparación; ya que estamos perdiendo dinero debido a este problema.

2025幎12月13日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Thank you for your response

Thank you for your response. However, there is no need for a meeting or further discussion.

I have close family members who work for other premium brand dealerships, and they have confirmed that this type of response is standard wording and rarely leads to any meaningful action. I am not interested in a conversation that goes nowhere.

What I want is accountability and real change. The two individuals involved should not be interacting with customers going forward — whether that means removal, replacement, or reassignment away from customer-facing roles. Their attitude and lack of basic customer service are completely unacceptable for a supposed premium brand.

The front desk in particular needs to be staffed by someone who greets customers with a smile, shows genuine respect, and actually knows what they are doing. What I experienced was dismissive, unprofessional, and poorly managed, and it reflects badly on Mercedes-Benz as a brand.

Unless genuine action is taken, this response feels like damage control rather than a sincere attempt to improve service standards.

2026幎1月20日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

The ultimate Mercedes paradox.” (più elegante)

I am extremely disappointed because I need to install a tow bar on my Mercedes GLS, but the dealership informed me that they do not approve the installation of an original Mercedes tow bar after purchase. You invest a significant amount of money in a premium vehicle, own one of the few cars capable of towing up to 3,500 kg, yet you are not allowed to install a tow bar at a later stage. Therefore, my advice is clear: either purchase the vehicle already equipped with a tow bar, or do not purchase this model at all.

2026幎1月19日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち2の評䟡

Die MobilitÀtsgarantie ist ein Witz

Die MobilitÀtsgarantie ist ein Witz. Nachdem ich einen Frendverschuldeten Unfall hatte, habe ich ÃŒber „me -Connect“ angerufen.
Alle Fahrzeugdaten waren bekannt.
Der Abschlepper der bestellt wurde konnte mein Pkw nicht aufnehmen.
Der neue Abschlepper sollte nochmal 2 Stunden dauern und als er endlich kam nach insgesamt nun Ìber 3 Stunden, hÀtte er mein Fahrzeug zwar aufnehmen können, wollte mich aber nicht in die mit Mercedes vereinbarte 35km entfernte Werkstatt bringen.(Laut Mercedes 50km Umkreis die haben es extra am Telefon gecheckt mit Adresse und bestÀtigt)
Sodass ich schlussendlich selbst mit dem kaputten PKW gegen jeden Rat ÃŒber die Autobahn in die Werkstatt an meinem Wohnort gefahren bin.
Weder ADAC noch der tolle MobilitÀtsservice fÌhlten sich fÌr das stundenlange Dilemma verantwortlich.
Wenigstens war der Service in der Werkstatt vor Ort wieder vernÃŒnftig.

2026幎1月20日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Disgusting customer service

Disgusting customer service. Especially from the receptionist Lily who seems very dim witted and department services. Give no respect to customers and staff aren’t aware of upcoming scheduled appointments and took 3 hours to do something that should have taken no more than 45 minutes.

2026幎1月19日
自発的なレビュヌ

レビュヌの察象になっおいる䌁業の方ぞ

プロフィヌルを登録しお、Trustpilot の無料ビゞネス ツヌルにアクセスし、お客様ずの぀ながりを広げおください。

無料アカりントを取埗

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

䌁業は、自動招埅を介しおレビュヌを䟝頌するこずができたす。この方法で埗られたレビュヌは、本物の経隓に基づいたものであり、確認枈みのラベルが付䞎されたす。

他の皮類のレビュヌに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報